20th IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance, 2004. Proceedings.
DOI: 10.1109/icsm.2004.1357795
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Composing a framework to automate testing of operational web-based software

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case we used an open source product named soapUI 6 . This tool takes a WSDL file as input and generates a test script for testing the web service described by that WSDL file.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this case we used an open source product named soapUI 6 . This tool takes a WSDL file as input and generates a test script for testing the web service described by that WSDL file.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [6] a framework has been presented to automate testing of operational web-based systems. In this framework, user sessions are extracted from the web server logs during real user interactions.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [25], we presented an initial framework. In this section, we focus on our improvements to test case collection, test suite generation, test suite replay, and fault detection.…”
Section: Automated Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a previous paper [25], we reported on our use of existing tools and the development of some simple scripts to automate the entire process from gathering user sessions through the identification of a reduced test suite and replay of that test suite for coverage analysis and fault detection. In this paper, we describe our work on replay and oracle comparators, which focuses on addressing the challenges posed by web applications' observability and controllability, derived from our experiences in experimentation with the prototype.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%