2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.11.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Component-based development and sensitivity analyses of an air pollutant dry deposition model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…If more than one monitor existed, the weather data closest to the geographic center of the area was used. Deposition velocities for all pollutants and resuspension rates for particulate matter were calculated based on methods detailed in Nowak et al (2006aNowak et al ( , 2013 and Hirabayashi et al (2011Hirabayashi et al ( , 2012. Total removal of a pollutant in a county was calculated as the annual flux value (mg m À2 yr À1 ) times total tree cover (m 2 ).…”
Section: à3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If more than one monitor existed, the weather data closest to the geographic center of the area was used. Deposition velocities for all pollutants and resuspension rates for particulate matter were calculated based on methods detailed in Nowak et al (2006aNowak et al ( , 2013 and Hirabayashi et al (2011Hirabayashi et al ( , 2012. Total removal of a pollutant in a county was calculated as the annual flux value (mg m À2 yr À1 ) times total tree cover (m 2 ).…”
Section: à3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aside from the existence of a large array of available options, the best combination for one region is not necessarily applicable to another (Krieger et al, 2009). According to Hirabayashi et al (2011), examining the sensitivity of a numerical model to changes in its configuration options constitutes an important evaluation exercise and this sensitivity analysis will allow, on the one hand, an improvement of the knowledge of how numerical simulation models work and, on the other hand, an identification of which model parameters need to be specified more accurately (Barnsley, 2007). Moreover, a sensitivity analysis can give to the modellers vital information about the use and influence of the several model parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these local fine-scale input data are often missing from urban areas and empirical data on the actual uptake of pollutants by urban vegetation are still limited (Pataki et al 2011;Setälä et al 2013), which makes a more accurate modeling of this ecosystem service unfeasible at the moment. For a sensitivity analysis of the i-Tree Eco deposition model see Hirabayashi et al (2011). Estimation errors in climate regulation service values include the uncertainty from using biomass equations and conversion factors as well as measurement errors (Nowak et al 2008a).…”
Section: Limitations and Caveatsmentioning
confidence: 99%