2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijms.2006.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Component and morphology biases on quantifying the composition of nanoparticles using single-particle mass spectrometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To obtain the mass concentrations of individual species from SPMS data, ionization efficiencies must be corrected for using relative sensitivity factors derived in lab calibration studies (Gross et al, 2000). The impacts of particle matrix and morphology on ionization have been examined recently by SPMS (Cai, Zelenyuk, & Imre, 2006; Zhou, Rai, & Zachariah, 2006b). Spatial inhomogeneities in the LDI beam impact ion signal reproducibility; however, these variations are reduced substantially by homogenizing the beam, such as with an optical fiber (Wenzel & Prather, 2004).…”
Section: On‐line Mass Spectrometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To obtain the mass concentrations of individual species from SPMS data, ionization efficiencies must be corrected for using relative sensitivity factors derived in lab calibration studies (Gross et al, 2000). The impacts of particle matrix and morphology on ionization have been examined recently by SPMS (Cai, Zelenyuk, & Imre, 2006; Zhou, Rai, & Zachariah, 2006b). Spatial inhomogeneities in the LDI beam impact ion signal reproducibility; however, these variations are reduced substantially by homogenizing the beam, such as with an optical fiber (Wenzel & Prather, 2004).…”
Section: On‐line Mass Spectrometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Composition measurements with SPMS are usually considered qualitative due to shot-to-shot variations in instrument function and a strong matrix effect that influences the ionisation process (Reilly et al, 2000;Zhou et al, 2006;Reinard and Johnston, 2008). These phenomena result in ion signals that are not proportional to the mass of the chemical species and a particle number counting bias with respect to particle type.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A reduction of such matrix effects can be achieved by separating the desorption and ionization process using a combination of a desorption (often infrared) laser and a UV laser 75, 97–99. Application of high irradiances of 10 10 W/cm 2 to 10 11 W/cm 2 completely vapourizes the particles and atoms are mostly converted to positively charged ions and electrons 100–102. This method improves atomic quantification at the cost of information of molecular particle components.…”
Section: Instrumentation—state Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thermodynamic calculations of the ion production rate are difficult because of many (mostly unknown) multi‐factorial parameters 47, 102. Reliable quantitative predictions for individual components in single ambient particles are therefore not possible 75.…”
Section: Instrumentation—state Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%