2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-2166(99)00127-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compliment responses among British and Spanish university students: a contrastive study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
61
0
10

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
61
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…The testing materials included an instrument to gauge pragmatic perception called a pragmatic acceptability judgment task (PAJT; Garcia, 2004) and a written discourse completion task (DCT; Beebe, Takahashi, & Uliss-Weltz, 1990;Liao & Bresnahan, 1996;Lorenzo-Dus, 2001). The pragmatic acceptability judgment task (PAJT) is a closed (i.e., multiple choice), instrument that gives participants the opportunity to identify pragmatically acceptable responses in 12 different dialogues (three for each of the targeted speech acts).…”
Section: Test Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The testing materials included an instrument to gauge pragmatic perception called a pragmatic acceptability judgment task (PAJT; Garcia, 2004) and a written discourse completion task (DCT; Beebe, Takahashi, & Uliss-Weltz, 1990;Liao & Bresnahan, 1996;Lorenzo-Dus, 2001). The pragmatic acceptability judgment task (PAJT) is a closed (i.e., multiple choice), instrument that gives participants the opportunity to identify pragmatically acceptable responses in 12 different dialogues (three for each of the targeted speech acts).…”
Section: Test Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Adapted from Beebe, et al, 1990;Liao & Bresnahan, 1996;Lorenzo-Dus, 2001) 1. You are the owner of a bookstore.…”
Section: Appendix 2 Sample Discourse Completion Task (Dct) Itemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the speech acts of compliment (Cs) and responding to compliments (CRs) are not an exception. Literature on the act of complimenting (e.g., Wolfson 1981;Manes, 1983;Knapp, Hopper & Bell, 1984;Barnlund &Araki, 1985;Holmes & Brown, 1987;Nelson, Bakery & Al-Batal, 1993;Garcia, 2012;Placencia & Lower, 2013;Evazzade & Katal, 2012;Goetzinger, Park, Widdows, 2006;Zarei, 2011) and responding to compliments (Holmes, 1988a(Holmes, , 1988bPomerantz, 1978;Hebert 1991;Hertbert & Straight, 1989;Chen, 1993;Nelson, Al-Batal & Echols, 1996, Lorenzo-Dus, 2001and Farghal & Al-Khatib, 2001;Cheng, 2011;Sadeghi & Foutooh, 2012;Cai, 2012;Hauser, 2008;Chen & Yang, 2010) has supported Wolfson's statement. These studies have shed light on the linguistic forms, the sociolinguistic functions and the strategies of Cs and CRs.…”
Section: The Act Of Complimenting and Responding To Complimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Nelson, Al-Batal & Echols' (1996) report, the term "mitigate" was used in replacement for deflecting, which in their study, becomes a subcategory under "mitigate"). However, on the one hand, the subcategories under these three broad categories are rather different in different studies (e.g., Daikuhara, 1986;1988;Herbert & Straight, 1989;Herbert, 1990;Chen, 1993;Nelson, Al-Batal & Echols, 1996;Farghal &Al-Khatib, 2001 andLorenzo-Dus, 2001). One example can be seen in the comparison of Chen's (1993) and Holmes's (1988a) theoretical framework as shown earlier in the present paper.…”
Section: International Journal Of Linguisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This explains why many scholars describe Peninsular Spanish culture as a culture that leans towards proximity in communication (Hickey 1991(Hickey , 2005Haverkate 1994Haverkate , 2003Haverkate , 2004Bravo 1999;Márquez Reiter 2000;Lorenzo-Dus 2001;Ardila 2002;Piatti 2003;Hernández Flores 2004Albelda 2004;Contreras Fernández 2005;Bernal 2007;Barros García 2011;among others), since social acceptance is crucially dependent on one's ability to establish a network of familylike bonds (Fant 1992: 150). For this reason, communicative success in Spanish interactions relies more on establishing friendly relationships by confirming and boosting the interlocutors' face with Face-Enhancing Acts (FEAs) 1 than on avoiding/mitigating Face-Threatening Acts (FTAs) 2 (Barros García & Terkourafi 2014a, 2014b.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%