2010
DOI: 10.1007/s12630-010-9406-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complications of peripheral nerve catheter removal at home: case series of five ambulatory interscalene blocks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to the recent report by Clendenen et al, 12 the CPNBs in our series were placed using both US and stimulation. Unlike the blocks in their series, ours were placed using a posterior in-plane approach rather than an out-of-plane approach.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similar to the recent report by Clendenen et al, 12 the CPNBs in our series were placed using both US and stimulation. Unlike the blocks in their series, ours were placed using a posterior in-plane approach rather than an out-of-plane approach.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…13,15Y18 These reports were in patients who were hospitalized, allowing them to be managed promptly by personnel trained in management of CPNBs. Clendenen et al 12 recently reported a series of 5 patients in whom ambulatory interscalene CPNB catheters were complicated by difficult catheter removal. Similar to our experience, patients in their series were difficult to manage as they were not able to easily return for evaluation and treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a previous report, we described additional complications due to shearing in five patients who received continuous nerve blocks with stimulating catheters. 3 Those reported complications suggested a dilemma in placing continuous stimulating perineural catheters on an ambulatory basis, i.e., in each case, a return trip to the hospital was required for removal. In this regard, we report tissue adhesions complicating removal of a stimulating catheter.…”
Section: To the Editormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Catheter shearing [1], knotting [2,3], retention [4,5] and nerve entrapment of catheters [6,7] have all been described in case reports. We came across a rare complication of an Arrow stimulating nerve block catheter used as a non-stimulating catheter.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%