2001
DOI: 10.1016/s1089-2516(01)90026-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complications of percutaneous transhepatic biliary interventions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
45
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 158 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
45
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, some lymphoma patients who require repeated biliary interventions for obstructive jaundice may benefit from early metal stent placement. In our study, plastic biliary stents placed via ERCP or PBD were efficacious in the majority of lymphoma patients, with high response rates and complication profiles comparable to those seen with other etiologies of malignant biliary obstruction [27,28].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…However, some lymphoma patients who require repeated biliary interventions for obstructive jaundice may benefit from early metal stent placement. In our study, plastic biliary stents placed via ERCP or PBD were efficacious in the majority of lymphoma patients, with high response rates and complication profiles comparable to those seen with other etiologies of malignant biliary obstruction [27,28].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Although both techniques are associated with considerable morbidity, patients undergoing PTBD frequently require multiple repeat interventions, and surgical drainage carries a significant risk for mortality. [5][6][7][8][9] EUS-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) has emerged over the last decade as an effective alternative, having significant potential for providing the least invasive and lowest risk method for biliary access. In 2008, an EUS working group convened to establish research priorities in an effort to accelerate the growth and development of interventional EUS.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2][3][4] Such patients usually have had percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) in the past, but at a cost of increased pain, procedural complications, and cosmetic problems related to the external drainage. 2,3,5,6 The presence of an external drainage catheter also has an adverse impact on the quality of life of terminally ill patients. 7 Since EUS-guided bile duct puncture was described in 1996, 8 sporadic case reports of EUS-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) have suggested that it is a feasible and effective alternative in patients with failed conventional ERCP stenting.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%