In comparison to most other craniomaxillofacial fractures, management of fractures involving the frontal sinus seems to be more complex than merely obtaining an ideal reduction of the bony injuries. Multiple articles on the management of these fractures suggest that a great deal of controversy persists, despite many years of surgical experience. 1-7 The controversy persists because these injuries have a propensity to develop significant delayed complications, sometimes years after an excellent reduction with a good cosmetic repair has been accomplished. 8 Whether or not to explore rather than observe a nondisplaced or minimally displaced fracture, and what procedure to perform if exploration is considered remain controversial. Furthermore, how severe must displacement/disruption be to require exploration and/or repair, whether or not a transient cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak requires exploration and/or repair, and whether or not the sinus should be obliterated and/or cranialized also remain areas of great controversy in the literature and among experienced surgeons. The question posed in this article is whether or not the advent of endoscopic approaches has changed or should change the approaches/algorithms used in the management of these challenging fractures. It is the opinion of the authors that the answer is "yes," and this article will discuss and illustrate some of the ways in which the endoscope offers new and hopefully better options for the management of these cases.
Why Is Management of the Frontal Sinus so Challenging?First and foremost, it is believed that avoiding frontal sinus complications seems to hinge on proper functioning of the nasofrontal duct (NFD), which would then allow drainage of the mucus produced in the sinus into the nasal cavity. (Note that anatomical studies raise question as to whether or not the NFD is a "true duct" in the majority of humans. Therefore, it will be referred to as the "frontal sinus outflow tract" [FSOT].) Fractures that involve the floor of the frontal sinus create significant risk of FSOT injury/disruption. Numerous authors have attempted to determine which fractures are most likely to predict an NFD injury and the best known algorithm for this was developed by Robert Stanley over 20 years ago. 2,3 He found that involvement of the supraorbital rims and nasoethmoid complex (NOE, also known as nasoorbital ethmoid [NOE] fractures) had the highest association with FSOT injury, followed by fractures that involved the
AbstractManagement of fractures involving the frontal sinus seems to be more complex than merely obtaining an ideal reduction of the bony injuries. Multiple articles on the management of these fractures suggest that a great deal of controversy persists despite many years of surgical experience. The question posed in this article is whether or not the advent of endoscopic approaches has changed or should change the approaches/ algorithms used in the management of these challenging fractures. It is the conclusion of these authors that endoscopic techniques...