2009
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1202597
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complications of Frontal Sinus Fractures

Abstract: Frontal sinus fracture represents 5 to 12% of all maxillofacial fractures. Because of the anatomic position of the frontal sinus and the enormous amount of force required to create a fracture in this area, these injuries are often devastating and associated with other trauma. Associated injuries include skull base, intracranial, ophthalmologic, and maxillofacial. Complications should be categorized to address these four areas as well as the skin-soft tissue envelope, muscle, and bone. Other variables that shou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7] The controversy persists because these injuries have a propensity to develop significant delayed complications, sometimes years after an excellent reduction with a good cosmetic repair has been accomplished. 8 Whether or not to explore rather than observe a nondisplaced or minimally displaced fracture, and what procedure to perform if exploration is considered remain controversial. Furthermore, how severe must displacement/disruption be to require exploration and/or repair, whether or not a transient cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak requires exploration and/or repair, and whether or not the sinus should be obliterated and/or cranialized also remain areas of great controversy in the literature and among experienced surgeons.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7] The controversy persists because these injuries have a propensity to develop significant delayed complications, sometimes years after an excellent reduction with a good cosmetic repair has been accomplished. 8 Whether or not to explore rather than observe a nondisplaced or minimally displaced fracture, and what procedure to perform if exploration is considered remain controversial. Furthermore, how severe must displacement/disruption be to require exploration and/or repair, whether or not a transient cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak requires exploration and/or repair, and whether or not the sinus should be obliterated and/or cranialized also remain areas of great controversy in the literature and among experienced surgeons.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other contributing factors include mucosal atopy, polyposis, neoplasia, and chronic rhinosinusitis. A history of trauma is occasionally elicited in patients with a sinus mucocele, often years or decades after the injury [3]. Mucocele that occurs in the frontal sinus may erode inferiorly into the orbit, producing orbital edema, diplopia, ptosis, enophthalmos, hypoglobus, or retro-orbital pain [4].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mucosa should be fastidiously removed, including from the vascular crypts of Breschet. Nasal communication should be eliminated and the sinus filled with graft tissue (Metzinger and Metzinger, 2009). This approach has been challenged based on the current understanding of osteoneogenesis.…”
Section: Surgical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%