2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.03.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complications following operative treatment of supination-adduction type II (AO/OTA 44A2.3) ankle fractures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PROMIS can reliably identify clinical, social, and psychological risk factors for poor outcomes. [25][26][27][28][29][32][33][34][35]. Its weaknesses are lack of specificity for certain body parts, its lack of validation for mental health outcomes, and its ceiling effect in certain active patient populations [23,32,35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…PROMIS can reliably identify clinical, social, and psychological risk factors for poor outcomes. [25][26][27][28][29][32][33][34][35]. Its weaknesses are lack of specificity for certain body parts, its lack of validation for mental health outcomes, and its ceiling effect in certain active patient populations [23,32,35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PROMIS has also provided valuable insight into outcomes after specific injury patterns [25][26][27][28][29]. Kohring For patients who sustain supination-adduction type ankle fractures, older age was significantly associated with worse PROMIS Physical Function scores; additionally, the direct medial approach to the ankle, compared to the anteromedial and posteromedial approaches, was associated with better PROMIS Pain Interference scores [27].…”
Section: Outcomes For Specific Injury Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is higher than previous reports of articular impaction in SAD patterns, which ranges from 42% to 61%. 1,8,16 We used CT scans to quantify maximum coronal and sagittal plane impaction, which perhaps provides a more comprehensive evaluation of the articular injury than previous methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The incidence of clinically meaningful articular impaction in SAD type II ankle fractures is largely unknown, although one recent series reports that impaction was noted intraoperatively half of the time and operatively addressed in 84% of these patients. 1,8,16 Furthermore, the influence of articular impaction and reduction quality on posttraumatic arthrosis remains understudied in these injuries. In a prior study, we reported that treatment failure was more common in pilon fractures compared with SAD ankle injuries and introduced the importance of anatomic restoration of the articular surface to optimize outcomes in these patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%