ince the first successful valve replacement using the original Starr-Edwards (S-E) caged silastic ball valve, some engineering modifications were made to enhance hemodynamic performance and fixation. The fabric covering was extended to the inflow orifice and then to the cage, and a silastic ball was changed to a stellite ball, which resulted in a group of "cloth-covered S-E ball valves". 1,2 Between June 1968 and March 1977, the clothcovered ball valves were used for aortic and mitral valve replacement (MVR) on a routine basis. Long-term results with the S-E ball valves have been reported showing satisfactory results with reliable durability and safety; they could represent the standard in mechanical valve replacement until recent prostheses can show a significant improvement in long-term results. However, reoperation after valve replacement with the S-E ball valve is unavoidable, and there have been only a few articles reporting detailed data concerning reoperations for the cloth-covered model of the S-E ball valve. The present study reports valve dysfunction and reoperation for the cloth-covered S-E ball prostheses.
Methods
PatientsThe cloth-covered S-E ball valves (aortic model 2300, 2310, 2320, and 2400, and mitral model 6300, 6310, 6320, and 6400) were implanted in the aortic and/or mitral position as the first choice for prosthetic substitution at our institution between June 1968 and March 1977. Oral anticoagulation regimens were administered after surgery and left at our outpatient clinic or local general practitioner's clinic. Among the 66 operative survivors who underwent an isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR; n=14) or MVR (n=52), 20 patients (11 male and 9 female) required reoperation 22 times because of valve dysfunction, thromboembolic complication, paravalvular leakage, hemolytic anemia, and/or prosthetic valve endocarditis. Reoperation was carried out at a mean of 15.9±9.8 years (range, 2.3 to 34.2 years) after initial valve replacement. The S-E valves were re-implanted 8 times in the aortic position (n=7; group A) and 14 times in the mitral position (n=13; group M) at a mean age of 44.7±13.9 years (range, 14 to 66 years). The S-E valves used at the initial operations and indications for reoperation are listed in Table 1. At reoperation, the heart was completely mobilized through a repeat median sternotomy and cardiopulmonary bypass was implemented through the femoral artery or the aorta for arterial perfusion, and right atrium for venous drainage. The patient's systemic temperature was cooled to 32°C and the heart was arrested using St Thomas' cold crystalloid cardioplegic solution. Care was taken during the prosthesis excision not to remove any structures from the prosthetic surfaces to avoid artificial changes on the prosthesis. The prosthetic valve was replaced using an interrupted method with braided polyester sutures or pledgeted polyester sutures at the supra-annular position.Excised valves were carefully examined, and morbidity after the initial and subsequent operations was defined