2010
DOI: 10.4293/108680810x12785289143800
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complications Associated With Two Laparoscopic Procedures Used in the Management of Rectal Endometriosis

Abstract: This study suggests that bladder and rectal dysfunction occur more frequently with colorectal resection in rectal endometriosis compared with excision of the nodules alone.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Of course, as with lapoconversion, more extensive surgery to the rectum would definitely mean higher complication rates [40 ,42 ]. In that case, statistically significant postoperative bladder atony and major constipation occurred in 20 and 27% of patients with colorectal resection, respectively, versus 0% for both complications in cases with disc excision of the endometriotic nodule [42 ]. Other complications for the procedure include anastomosis leakage, pelvic abscess, rectal bleeding, which may require blood transfusion, vaginal or uterine perforation, bladder or ureteral injury, small bowel injury, and motor nerve palsies.…”
Section: Laparoscopic Rectal Resection: An Option That Should Not Be mentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Of course, as with lapoconversion, more extensive surgery to the rectum would definitely mean higher complication rates [40 ,42 ]. In that case, statistically significant postoperative bladder atony and major constipation occurred in 20 and 27% of patients with colorectal resection, respectively, versus 0% for both complications in cases with disc excision of the endometriotic nodule [42 ]. Other complications for the procedure include anastomosis leakage, pelvic abscess, rectal bleeding, which may require blood transfusion, vaginal or uterine perforation, bladder or ureteral injury, small bowel injury, and motor nerve palsies.…”
Section: Laparoscopic Rectal Resection: An Option That Should Not Be mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Additionally Juhasz-Bö ss et al [21] in 2010 showed 50% improvement in dysmenorrhea, 75% disappearance in dyspareunia, and pelvic pain. Nevertheless, patient satisfaction was also noted where patients recommended similar surgery for other women in 80-100% of the cases [42 ]. Even in rare conditions wherein there was somatic and pelvic nerve involvement, laparoscopic nerve sparing procedures proved effective without causing nerve injury while offering remarkably satisfactory results [50].…”
Section: Efficacy Of Different Surgical Procedures In the Treatment Omentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It is important to note that severe constipation was observed only in the women treated with colorectal resection. In another comparative study, Roman et al (11) reported anastomotic leakage in 6% of cases after colorectal resection, whereas no major complications were observed in the nodule excision group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Si la pertinence du traitement chirurgical en cas de retentissement sur la qualité de vie est actuellement établie, le débat concerne actuellement le choix de la technique chirurgicale. Deux approches différentes sont couramment employées : d'une part, les résections colorectales segmentaires et d'autre part l'exérèse du nodule endométriosique avec ou sans ouverture du sigmoïde ou du rectum [11,12].…”
Section: Discussionunclassified