Complication of diagnostic pleural aspiration: Is it of value in hemodialysis patients?

Abstract

Pleural effusions are common in hemodialysis patients and are associated with significant morbidity. Diagnostic pleural aspiration and subsequent biochemical analysis can be used to differentiate exudates and transudates. In particular, Light's criteria have been validated in the general population although their efficacy in hemodialysis patients is unclear. Furthermore, aspiration is not without risk; we report the case of a life-threatening thoracic bleed as a complication of diagnostic thoracocentesis in a hemodialysis patient, in whom a transudative effusion was misclassified according to Light's criteria. Retrospective examination of a further 22 aspirations in hemodialysis patients suggests that biochemical analysis of pleural fluid in this group is of limited value. Careful clinical and radiological assessment may be of greater value in determining individuals who may benefit from formal drainage, rather than diagnostic aspiration with its attendant risks.

Unusual diagnosis of urinothorax: a case report

“…15,16 The reported cases of urinothorax are generally seen in adults; however, there are cases where it is diagnosed in children as well. 17 In the present case, the pleural fluid biochemistry was altered due to HD, thus altering the pleural fluid/serum creatinine ratio 18 and affecting the diagnosis. However, a history of obstructive uropathy combined with pleural effusion and radiological evidences of urine seepage as well as marked improvement in the patient's condition post-surgery, accompanied by a reduction without recurrence of pleural effusion post-DJ stenting was an indirect evidence confirming the diagnosis of urinothorax.…”