2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation 2013
DOI: 10.1109/icra.2013.6630645
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

COMpliant huMANoid COMAN: Optimal joint stiffness tuning for modal frequency control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
101
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 199 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
101
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The compliance values are fixed at this stage, using the initial values for COMAN [5]. The tasks trajectories are first specified in Cartesian space, converted to joint space using inverse kinematics and then the full body dynamics is simulated using a Runge-Kutta solver.…”
Section: Task Descriptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The compliance values are fixed at this stage, using the initial values for COMAN [5]. The tasks trajectories are first specified in Cartesian space, converted to joint space using inverse kinematics and then the full body dynamics is simulated using a Runge-Kutta solver.…”
Section: Task Descriptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for a multi degree of freedom humanoid like COMAN, these processes demand a tedious work and is undesirable. Therefore, [5] suggests an multi-body optimization method that maximizes the stored energy in joint springs and places an inequality constraint on natural frequencies of the system and stiffnesses range. The cost function of the optimization is:…”
Section: Compliance Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The experiments were performed with the LWR-III and a standard industrial EPSON PS3L robot, see Figs. 7,8. In the experiments, three end-effectors (plane, line (radius 3 mm), and point (radius 2 mm)) were used, see Fig. 9.…”
Section: Setup Pmla/human Volunteer Impact Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,6 Further examples of this novel class of robots are Barrett's WAM Arm, 2 Rethink Robotics Baxter, 3 or also more recently the class of variable stiffness/impedance robots. 7,8 Of course, the target domains envisaged for such novel solutions raise the key question of how to ensure human safety during pHRI. 9 As the physical contact between human and robot is the primary potential cause of injury in pHRI, its fundamentals have to be well understood and according countermeasures for its prevention are to be found.…”
Section: Introduction and Contributionmentioning
confidence: 99%