Compliance with Smoke-Free Policies in Korean Bars and Restaurants in California: a Descriptive Analysis

Irvin, Veronica L.; Hofstetter, C. Richard; Nichols, Jeanne F.; Chambers, Christina D.; Usita, Paula M.; Norman, Gregory J.; Kang, Seungmo; Hovell, Melbourne F.

doi:10.7314/apjcp.2015.16.3.1083

Cited by 5 publications

(15 citation statements)

References 39 publications

(53 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…We assessed 114 full-text articles for eligibility and, finally, 17 articles published between 1998 and 2015 were included in this review. In these included studies, one article [23] was published before 2000, eight articles [16,17,18,24,25,26,27,28] were published between 2000 and 2009, and eight articles [5,9,29,30,31,32,33,34] were published after 2010. …”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…As shown in Table 1, the included studies focused on four types of public places including recreational venues (e.g., bars, restaurants; n = 7) [5,9,24,26,27,28,29], hospital ( n = 5) [17,18,23,25,30], school ( n = 4) [16,31,32,33], and workplace( n = 1) [34]. Eight studies were conducted in North America (two in Canada [26,30] and six in the USA [18,23,24,28,29,33], four in European countries [16,17,25,31], one in Asian countries [9], one in Australia [32], and three in multiple countries [5,27,34].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Eight studies were conducted in North America (two in Canada [26,30] and six in the USA [18,23,24,28,29,33], four in European countries [16,17,25,31], one in Asian countries [9], one in Australia [32], and three in multiple countries [5,27,34]. Twelve quantitative studies [5,9,16,17,18,23,25,26,27,29,31,34] were identified in this review. Nine studies were cross-sectional [9,16,17,23,25,26,27,31,34] and three were cohort [5,18,29].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Twelve quantitative studies [5,9,16,17,18,23,25,26,27,29,31,34] were identified in this review. Nine studies were cross-sectional [9,16,17,23,25,26,27,31,34] and three were cohort [5,18,29]. Sample sizes ranged from 101 to 9046 participants.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Sample sizes ranged from 101 to 9046 participants. In the survey instrument, six studies [18,23,27,29,31,34] used self-designed questionnaires, six studies [5,9,16,17,25,26] used the scale from the published literature, five studies [9,17,23,25,26] of which provided information on the reliability or validity. Two qualitative studies [30,32] used semi-structured interviews and purposive sampling methods, with a sample size of 37 [32] and 82 [30] respectively.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Facilitators and Barriers of Smokers’ Compliance with Smoking Bans in Public Places: A Systematic Review of Quantitative and Qualitative Literature

Zhou

Niu

Jiang

et al. 2016

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) exposure is associated with an increased risk of many diseases. Many countries have ratified a national smoking ban in public places, but studies on factors related to smoking issues in public places post-ban are lacking. Aim: To identify facilitators and barriers that influenced smokers’ compliance with smoking bans in public places. Methods: Using PubMed, MEDLINE, and the Web of Science database, we conducted a systematic search of English articles published before June 2015 on factors of smokers’ compliance with the smoking bans in public places. Results: A total of 390 references were identified, among which seventeen articles (twelve quantitative studies, two qualitative studies, three mixed-method studies) were included in this review. These studies focused on four types of public places including recreational venues (n = 7), hospital (n = 5), school (n = 4), and workplace (n = 1). Factors at the individual-, interpersonal-, and organizational-level were identified: at the individual level, nicotine dependence, insufficiency of tobacco-related knowledge, and the negative attitudes towards smoking bans were the most commonly identified barriers; at the interpersonal level, the smoking behaviors of people around, close relatives, and friends’ approval were the main barriers; and at the organizational level, the main barriers were inefficient implementation of the bans and the inconvenience of the designative smoking areas. Conclusions: This synthesis of the literature provided evidence of the identified barriers and facilitators of smokers’ compliance with the smoking bans. It will be beneficial for the policy-maker to consider interventions on multiple levels of factors to overcome the barriers and enhance smokers’ compliance with the smoking bans in public places.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Facilitators and Barriers of Smokers’ Compliance with Smoking Bans in Public Places: A Systematic Review of Quantitative and Qualitative Literature

Zhou

Niu

Jiang

et al. 2016

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Noncompliance to smoke-free law: which hospitality premises are more prone?

Evrengil²,

Güner³

et al. 2016

Public Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Non‐smoker assertive behaviour against smoke exposure: Chinese and Korean American non‐smokers

Saw

Tang

Tsoh

et al. 2017

Drug and Alcohol Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction Non-smokers’ assertive behaviour towards smokers by asking them not to smoke is important in promoting smokefree environments. Korean and Chinese Americans come from countries where most women are non-smokers and assertive behaviour may not be prevalent but may increase after migration due to social-ecological factors. This study assessed the extent to which Korean and Chinese American non-smokers ask someone not to smoke and associated factors. Methods The 2003 California Chinese American and Korean American Tobacco Use Surveys were analysed. Multivariate logistic regression analyses examined factors related to non-smoker self-reports that they asked someone not to smoke within the past year. Results Forty percent reported past year assertive behaviour against smoking, with higher rates among Koreans than Chinese (60.4% vs. 34.5%). Rates were also higher among those living with smokers (63.5%), ever exposed with a smokefree home rule (62.3%), recently exposed at work without a smokefree work policy (67.6%) and regularly exposed at other locations (52.3%). In combined multivariate analyses of both ethnic groups, assertive behaviour was associated with individual factors (single vs. married, tobacco exposure knowledge), family factors (living with smokers, exposed at home despite a smokefree rule), community factors (exposed at work with no smokefree policy, exposed at other locations) and cultural factors (Korean vs. Chinese ethnicity, lower acculturation). Discussion and Conclusions Chinese and Korean American non-smokers report assertive behaviour against smoking, which is associated with social-ecological factors. Results help identify target groups and strategies for future intervention, including the need to implement or enforce smokefree environments and promote empowerment.

show abstract

Compliance with Smoke-Free Policies in Korean Bars and Restaurants in California: a Descriptive Analysis

Cited by 5 publications

References 39 publications

Facilitators and Barriers of Smokers’ Compliance with Smoking Bans in Public Places: A Systematic Review of Quantitative and Qualitative Literature

Facilitators and Barriers of Smokers’ Compliance with Smoking Bans in Public Places: A Systematic Review of Quantitative and Qualitative Literature

Noncompliance to smoke-free law: which hospitality premises are more prone?

Non‐smoker assertive behaviour against smoke exposure: Chinese and Korean American non‐smokers

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About