2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2021.104717
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compliance error compensation of a robot end-effector with joint stiffness uncertainties for milling: An analytical model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the adjusted pose, this problem is turned into the IK problem of the manipulator. In this work, the IK model is established based on screw-based IK sub-problems proposed in our previous work, 32 where sub-problems are converted into the solving of an equation set composed of several quadratic and linear equations. The kinematics parameters of the manipulator is shown as Figure 5.…”
Section: Models Of Performance Indexesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With the adjusted pose, this problem is turned into the IK problem of the manipulator. In this work, the IK model is established based on screw-based IK sub-problems proposed in our previous work, 32 where sub-problems are converted into the solving of an equation set composed of several quadratic and linear equations. The kinematics parameters of the manipulator is shown as Figure 5.…”
Section: Models Of Performance Indexesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the motion accuracy of the manipulator is mainly affected by the positioning accuracy of the mobile device (PAMD), the manipulator flexibility (MF) when the robot operates with high-load end-effector tool, and interpolation planning (IP). In previous studies, PAMD was always controlled based on visual feedback, like reference reports 30, 31 ; the end-effector motion error caused by MF can be effectively predicted and compensated accurately through mathematical modeling based on the complex dynamics analysis of joints and links 32 ; for the continuous trajectory task, the trajectory tracking error 33 caused by IP can be calculated by the difference between planned and desired trajectory. From the above discussion, time-consuming calculations of performance models during optimization iteration have the major impact on the execution time of the algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The range of possibilities and expectations for robot applications in machining and pre-machining tasks is reflected in the large collection of reviews and papers in the specialized literature [1][2][3]. The major challenges facing machining with robots versus machining with machine tools remain today [4] the characterization of robot stiffness and robot configuration [5], path planning and dynamics, vibration during machining [6] and robot deformation and compensation [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Passive force control is achieved through energy absorption or the storage of the auxiliary flexibility mechanism, and the robot is still in position control mode [17,18]. Typical force control devices mainly include voice coil motor actuators [19,20], parallel mechanism actuators [21,22], pneumatic actuators [23][24][25], mechanically flexible structures [26][27][28][29], force control joints [30], etc. Chen et al [31] adopted a dual force sensor to decouple the dynamics between the macro robot, micro robot, and workpiece to achieve high-precision force control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%