1981
DOI: 10.1111/j.1939-0025.1981.tb01393.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compliance, defiance, and therapeutic paradox: Guidelines for strategic use of paradoxical interventions.

Abstract: Strategies and tactics in apparent opposition to desired therapeutic goals are discussed in the context of brief problems-focused therapy. Two types of paradoxical intervention are differentiated: in one, change follows from attempted compliance with a therapeutic directive; in the other, change follows from defiance. Brehm's reactance theory and the Palo Alto brief therapy model offer guidelines for the use of such strategies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
49
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in accord with previous research involving patients with minor psychiatric disorders which demonstrated a greater degree of non-compliance in reactance-prone individuals compared with reactance individuals (Rohrbaugh, Tennen, Press, & White, 1981 ;Graybar, Antonuccio, Boutilier, & Varble, 1989).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…This is in accord with previous research involving patients with minor psychiatric disorders which demonstrated a greater degree of non-compliance in reactance-prone individuals compared with reactance individuals (Rohrbaugh, Tennen, Press, & White, 1981 ;Graybar, Antonuccio, Boutilier, & Varble, 1989).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…However, despite the widespread application of PI to anxiety related problems, we have not found any report on conversion disorder, an anxiety disorder which is known to be more prevalent in lower sociocultural classes and counts up to more than 55% of the psychiatric diagnoses in our emergency unit. One of the application criteria for paradoxical approaches defined by Rohrbaugh et al is as follows; ''Where opposition is low and symptoms are seen by the patient as outside of control'' (8). In conversion disorder, there is no patient opposition to symptoms, and symptoms are outside of the patients control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Defiance-based paradoxes can be delivered in at least three ways (Rohrbaugh et al, 1981 ). First, children can be instructed to delay changing their behaviors by having them move more slowly than they expect.…”
Section: Defiance-based Paradoxesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The student who was instructed to bring on anxiety 15 minutes prior to taking a math quiz is an example of a compliance-based paradox. It also made use of scheduling-having a child express a behavior in different locations, durations, or times before it occurs spontaneously (Rohrbaugh, Tennen, Press, & White, 1981).…”
Section: Compliance-based Paradoxesmentioning
confidence: 99%