2017
DOI: 10.1109/tie.2017.2682002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compliance-Based Robotic Peg-in-Hole Assembly Strategy Without Force Feedback

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
63
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar observations were reported by Liu and Carpin who showed that the convergence time for grasp planning was positively correlated while the probability of force closure was negatively correlated with increasing positional uncertainty [30]. Therefore, these active control techniques, as well as other, passive or hybrid compliance strategies [31][32][33][34][35], will still benefit from improved accuracy of the object's pose in the robot's frame.…”
Section: Related Worksupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Similar observations were reported by Liu and Carpin who showed that the convergence time for grasp planning was positively correlated while the probability of force closure was negatively correlated with increasing positional uncertainty [30]. Therefore, these active control techniques, as well as other, passive or hybrid compliance strategies [31][32][33][34][35], will still benefit from improved accuracy of the object's pose in the robot's frame.…”
Section: Related Worksupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Meeussen et al developed an approach to convert a contact path into a force-based task specification for executing the compliant path via hybrid position and force control [15]. Park et al developed a procedure and a controller that yield compliant behavior using neither force feedback nor passive compliance mechanisms to solve the peg-in-hole assembly problem [16].…”
Section: Related Work a Compliant Graspsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simulation results in Table 2 indicate that the key components of the compliant device cause slight deformation and stress in the designed working conditions, have minimal influence on the performance of the compliant device and can satisfy the actual working requirements. FIGURE 6 shows the four states involved in the peg-in-hole assembly: contacting, searching, adjusting and inserting [24]. FIGURE 6(a) shows that the peg is in contact with the hole under a force that push the peg toward the hole.…”
Section: B Analysis Of the Proposed Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%