2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.precisioneng.2023.03.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compliance and precision modeling of general notch flexure hinges using a discrete-beam transfer matrix

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The orientation angle of each constant beam segment for straight notch flexure hinges is identical, while the orientation angle of each constant beam segment is variable and equals to the tangent angle of the centroidal axis for curved beams. With such a discrete operation, the end‐tip displacements and forces of a notch flexure hinge or curved beam are directly related by successively postmultiplying the elemental transfer matrix of each discretized constant beam segment with the discrete number of N 56,69 : }{Xi,kbold-italicFi,k=][N1RpΤbold-italicTpe(ω)bold-italicRp}{Xi,jFi,j, $\left\{\begin{array}{c}{{\boldsymbol{X}}}_{i,k}\\ -{{\boldsymbol{F}}}_{i,k}\end{array}\right\}=\left[\prod _{N}^{1}{{{\boldsymbol{R}}}_{p}}^{{\rm T}}{{\boldsymbol{T}}}_{p}^{e}(\omega ){{\boldsymbol{R}}}_{p}\right]\cdot \left\{\begin{array}{c}{{\boldsymbol{X}}}_{i,j}\\ {{\boldsymbol{F}}}_{i,j}\end{array}\right\},$where T p e ( ω ) denotes the transfer matrix of the p th discretized constant beam element ( p = 1, …, N ) and can be calculated using Equation (). R p denotes the coordinate transformation matrix of the p th discretized constant beam element.…”
Section: The Presented Modeling Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The orientation angle of each constant beam segment for straight notch flexure hinges is identical, while the orientation angle of each constant beam segment is variable and equals to the tangent angle of the centroidal axis for curved beams. With such a discrete operation, the end‐tip displacements and forces of a notch flexure hinge or curved beam are directly related by successively postmultiplying the elemental transfer matrix of each discretized constant beam segment with the discrete number of N 56,69 : }{Xi,kbold-italicFi,k=][N1RpΤbold-italicTpe(ω)bold-italicRp}{Xi,jFi,j, $\left\{\begin{array}{c}{{\boldsymbol{X}}}_{i,k}\\ -{{\boldsymbol{F}}}_{i,k}\end{array}\right\}=\left[\prod _{N}^{1}{{{\boldsymbol{R}}}_{p}}^{{\rm T}}{{\boldsymbol{T}}}_{p}^{e}(\omega ){{\boldsymbol{R}}}_{p}\right]\cdot \left\{\begin{array}{c}{{\boldsymbol{X}}}_{i,j}\\ {{\boldsymbol{F}}}_{i,j}\end{array}\right\},$where T p e ( ω ) denotes the transfer matrix of the p th discretized constant beam element ( p = 1, …, N ) and can be calculated using Equation (). R p denotes the coordinate transformation matrix of the p th discretized constant beam element.…”
Section: The Presented Modeling Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, the unwanted effects of friction, bucklash, and wear, which always appear during the exploitation of mechanisms with classic joints, were avoided. In the literature, various procedures have been developed for kinetostatic and dynamic analyses of compliant mechanisms such as the transfer matrix method [6][7][8][9][10], the dynamic stifness method [11,12], the beam theory based method [13][14][15], the pseudo-rigid-body model [16][17][18][19][20], the finite element method [21][22][23], the multi-compliant-body matrix method [24], the compliance matrix method [25][26][27], the Castigliano's second theorem based method [28], the unit-load method [29] etc. A survey of results, methods, and ongoing problems in compliant mechanisms research field was given in [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%