The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.09.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complexity theory as an approach to explanation in healthcare: A critical discussion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
57
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
57
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, some components, such as attractors, seem to be open to ambiguity. For example, Paley and Eva (2011) commented that the whole concept of attractors is often misinterpreted as an 'intentional' phenomena, when, in fact, it originates in mathematics as an algebraic descriptor of certain endpoints or end states in a system (such as the point where a pendulum comes to rest). In this paper, we have translated this concept into an end state, where the system is still flexible, but within a more or less defined rage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, some components, such as attractors, seem to be open to ambiguity. For example, Paley and Eva (2011) commented that the whole concept of attractors is often misinterpreted as an 'intentional' phenomena, when, in fact, it originates in mathematics as an algebraic descriptor of certain endpoints or end states in a system (such as the point where a pendulum comes to rest). In this paper, we have translated this concept into an end state, where the system is still flexible, but within a more or less defined rage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He described complex adaptive systems as non-linear systems in which diverse agents interact with each other and are capable of undergoing spontaneous self-organisation. Since 2001, when the British Medical Journal launched a series of articles on complexity in health care (Fraser and Greenhalgh, 2001;Plesk and Greenhalgh, 2001;Plsek and Wilson, 2001;Wilson et al, 2001), there has been a growing debate around the use of the theory in the health care context (Reid, 2001;Paley, 2007;Sturmberg, 2007;Dattée and Barlow, 2010;Greenhalgh et al, 2010;Paley and Eva, 2011;Sturmberg et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1] These and other conversations ignited some opposition to the use of what was argued to be the misguided appropriation and psychologising of complexity theory in its application to health care. [24,25] Despite this opposition the concepts and metaphors drawn from this theory clearly continue to help people to make sense of the healthcare environment in which they work and inspire them to think creatively about approaches to managing the complex problems they encounter. [18] This can be seen in a range of areas where 'complexity thinking' continues to inspire change and innovation in curricula across a variety of health disciplines such as, for example, medicine, [26] healthcare management, [27] dentistry, [28] sports science, [29] interprofessional practice [30] and nursing.…”
Section: Developing a Guiding Conceptual Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Complexity science fits well with the unruly day-to-day reality of primary care psychologists (Smit, 2015). There is no formal definition of complexity sciences but this emerging approach to research can be seen as a collection of theories and conceptual tools (Benham-Hutchins & Clancy, 2010; Paley & Gail, 2011). It can be described as the scientific study of complex systems, in which many parts interact.…”
Section: Vignette Studymentioning
confidence: 99%