2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2010.05.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complexity of single machine scheduling subject to nonnegative inventory constraints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Constraints (2) express that the jobs assigned to the first ℓ supply periods cannot consume more resource(s) than the total supply over the first ℓ supply periods. Constraints (3) ensure that each job has to be assigned to exactly one supply period.…”
Section: Problem 1|rm Ddc|c Maxmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Constraints (2) express that the jobs assigned to the first ℓ supply periods cannot consume more resource(s) than the total supply over the first ℓ supply periods. Constraints (3) ensure that each job has to be assigned to exactly one supply period.…”
Section: Problem 1|rm Ddc|c Maxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a more general setting, jobs may consume as well as produce non-renewable resources. In [2], Briskorn et al study the complexity of several variants, while Briskorn et al [3] devise a branch-andbound method for minimizing the weighted sum of job completion times on a single machine. However, none of these papers propose approximation schemes for NPhard special cases of single machine scheduling subject to non-renewable resource constraints for the makespan objective.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some numerical results complement the theoretical findings. This line of work has been taken up by Briskorn et al [2], where several variants are studied, and either an NP-hardness proof is presented, or a polynomial time algorithm is devised. In [3], an exact branch-and-bound based method is developed and numerical results are provided for the general problem with 5 to 20 jobs.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different truck scheduling procedures which vary, e.g., with regard to the number of dock doors, the objective function applied, whether or not transportation times inside the terminal are considered and whether or not commodities are interchangeable between outbound trucks, are presented by Boysen [1], Boysen et al [3], Briskorn et al [4], Chen and Lee [6], Chen and Song [7], Miao et al [17] as well as Yu and Egbelu [23]. However, all of these papers concur in their assumption on the organization of outbound trucks' departures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since max {C i | i ∈ I} < d 6 outbound truck 6 is provided non-tardily by all inbound trucks. Summarizing, we have U(S) = {(2, 1), (3, 1), (4, 1), (4, 2), (5, 1), (5, 2), (5, 3), (6, 1), (6,2), (6,3), (6,4), (6,5), (7,1), (8,1), (8,2), (9, 1), (9, 2), (9, 3), (11,1), (12,1), (12,2), (13,1), (13,2), (13,3), (14,1), (14,2), (14,3), (14,4) …”
Section: Formal Problem Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%