2016
DOI: 10.1111/een.12332
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complexity of leaf miner–parasitoid food webs declines with canopy height in Patagonian beech forests

Abstract: 1. Consumer-resource species interactions form complex, dynamic networks, which may exhibit structural heterogeneity at various scales. This study set out to address whether host-parasitoid food web size and topology vary across forest canopy strata, and to what extent foliar resources and species abundances account for vertical patterns in network structure.2. The vertical stratification of leaf miner-parasitoid food webs was examined in two monotypic beech (Nothofagus pumilio) forests in northern Patagonia, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the higher diversity recorded in the first level might be due to the involvement of understory species, supporting our original hypothesis. The higher diversity of the third level might be explained by the presence of species‐rich semiconcealed feeders, which were considerably less numerous in the first level, supporting the original hypothesis of the competitive advantage of the concealed feeders in the harsh upper canopy environment (Chaij et al., 2016; Paniagua et al., 2009; Ribeiro & Basset, 2007). However, in our study, due to the absence of the upper canopy per se, differences in the ecological conditions (e.g., solar radiation, temperature, wind speed; Basset, Horlyck, et al., 2003; Parker, 1995) between the second and third levels were blurred.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, the higher diversity recorded in the first level might be due to the involvement of understory species, supporting our original hypothesis. The higher diversity of the third level might be explained by the presence of species‐rich semiconcealed feeders, which were considerably less numerous in the first level, supporting the original hypothesis of the competitive advantage of the concealed feeders in the harsh upper canopy environment (Chaij et al., 2016; Paniagua et al., 2009; Ribeiro & Basset, 2007). However, in our study, due to the absence of the upper canopy per se, differences in the ecological conditions (e.g., solar radiation, temperature, wind speed; Basset, Horlyck, et al., 2003; Parker, 1995) between the second and third levels were blurred.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison, the less host‐specific Ichneumonidae and Braconidae used their hosts nonrandomly, preferring the first canopy level. This phenomenon suggests some environmental (Basset, Hammond, et al., 2003; Ulyshen, 2011) and/or life history constraints within these groups, such as low dispersal capacity (Godfray, 1994) and/or limited number of eggs carried by females combined with the proximity of overwintering sites to the first canopy level (Chaij et al., 2016; Heimpel, Mangel, & Rosenheim, 1998). Moreover, most parasitoids depend on sugar resources, due to their high activity (Shaw, 2006), with sugar feeding increasing host encounter rates (Forsse, Smith, & Bourchier, 1992).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations