2010 6th International Symposium on Turbo Codes &Amp; Iterative Information Processing 2010
DOI: 10.1109/istc.2010.5613874
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complexity evaluation of non-binary Galois field LDPC code decoders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the layered decoding approach [29]- [31], the parity check matrix is partitioned into layers (12) Accordingly, each layer associates with one super-code , and the original code can be treated as the intersection of all super-codes (13) The column weight of each layer is restricted to be equal or less than 1.…”
Section: A Review Of Layered Decoding Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the layered decoding approach [29]- [31], the parity check matrix is partitioned into layers (12) Accordingly, each layer associates with one super-code , and the original code can be treated as the intersection of all super-codes (13) The column weight of each layer is restricted to be equal or less than 1.…”
Section: A Review Of Layered Decoding Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our design is also more efficient than the one in [9]. In [10] and [11], the field-programmable gate array (FPGA)-based results cannot be compared directly. However, considering the efficiency of the path construction method, the new architecture should cost less hardware.…”
Section: B Comparison With Other Implementation Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies were performed on the decoding algorithms for NB-LDPC codes. Although belief propagation [1] and the Fourier domain decoding algorithm [2] show high error-correction performances, their decoding complexities are significantly high. Symbol-flipping algorithms offer low decoding complexity but significantly degraded errorcorrection performance [3,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%