2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-60026-6_16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complexity Estimates for Fourier-Motzkin Elimination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, the Fourier-Motzkin-Elimination algorithm [27], which is a well-known general projection method, is known for its double exponential complexity, that is O((|E| + |V |) 2 (|E|+|V |) ) for our case. A recently developed general algorithm [28] enjoys a single exponential complexity, but with much higher exponents; namely O((|E|…”
Section: B Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, the Fourier-Motzkin-Elimination algorithm [27], which is a well-known general projection method, is known for its double exponential complexity, that is O((|E| + |V |) 2 (|E|+|V |) ) for our case. A recently developed general algorithm [28] enjoys a single exponential complexity, but with much higher exponents; namely O((|E|…”
Section: B Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, finding a projection from a space with a higher dimension is difficult. Applying general-purpose projection methods [27], [28] requires a prohibitive amount of computation, especially for large-scale instances. Additionally, finding a minimal representation for this projection is important because performance in joint chance-constrained programs depends significantly on the number of constraints that are contained in the probabilistic constraints.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Redundancies might already be contained in the input system, or they arise during the projection operation. While removing all redundancies is expensive, there are efficient methods for removing some redundancies of the latter type, for example Imbert's acceleration theorems [10,11,12]. 1 Remember that we use lower case letters for rows of matrices with the respective upper case letter as name.…”
Section: Fourier-motzkin Variable Eliminationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to the other two approaches, FM admits quantifier elimination, but it has a doubly exponential worst case complexity, even though there have been various efforts to improve its efficiency by recognizing and avoiding redundant computations (e.g. [11,12]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…) involving only m 1 and n 1 for W ∈ R m1×n1 (see [20,30,33]). Thus, |J| < +∞ regardless of the cardinalities of {W ξ } ⊆ R m1×n1 .…”
Section: Examples and Special Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%