Complexity-based quality indicators for human and social capital in science and research: the case of Serbian Homeland versus Diaspora

Djurić, Milena; Dobrota, Marina; Filipović, Jovan

doi:10.1007/s11192-020-03428-2

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 80 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…У том светлу, Djuric et al (2019) предлажу развој модела индикатора којима би се овај утицај пратио и мерио, па чак и на појединачном нивоу -не само оних ређих, веома етаблираних научника, него и многобројних припадника научно-истраживачке заједнице; у свом истраживању, које се односило на примену развијеног модела, доказују да постоје значајне разлике у измереном учинку (тј. "перформансама") на том плану, између научника и истраживача потврђеног српског порекла који живе и раде у Републици Србији и региону, у односу на оне у дијаспори, а битан фактор који производи предметну разлику јесу управо стандарди и процеси који се односе на менаџмент њиховог рада (Djuric et al, 2020).…”

Section: слика 1 сарадња између универзитетских и привредних организа...unclassified

Development of international standards for university-business collaboration

Đurić

2023

Proceedings of the 36th International Congress on Process Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Collaboration between academic and business organizations has always been a topic that attracted the attention of both sides, but the mere absence of significant international or global standards that would regulate this area implies that its potential still hasn’t been sufficiently used. In the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), within one of the more active technical committees - ISO/TC 286 Collaborative business relationship management, relatively recently, in March 2022, a special working group was formed, with the aim to develop the first potentially global standard with the guidelines for cooperation between organizations that are part of the universities and all the others, commercial and non-commercial, that are external to the universities. The Republic of Serbia, i.e. its representatives - on behalf of the Institute for Standardization of Serbia, represents one of the first countries participating in this process, which is organizationally and administratively led by experts from China and the UK, delegated by the Chinese and British standardization bodies. This invited paper/lecture provides both overview of the current state and trends regarding university-business colaboration (UBC) standardization process, as well as the basic characteristics of the current, draft version of the document entitled "ISO 44006 Collaborative business relationship management — Guidelines for university-business collaboration". According to the current plans, this standard should be published in 2025 and should serve as a guide for universities, businesses, and other stakeholders in using the already existing 12 principles of collaborative business relationships to improve their capability in university-business collaboration.

show abstract

Section: слика 1 сарадња између универзитетских и привредних организа...unclassified

Development of international standards for university-business collaboration

Đurić

2023

Proceedings of the 36th International Congress on Process Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Yet, in the knowledge-based economy (KBE), universities are important stakeholders who produce knowledge and train skilled HC, such as PhD graduates (Hancock et al, 2017). PhD holders are essential to IC (Caparrós-Ruiz, 2019;Djuric et al, 2020;Pretorius and Macaulay, 2021) and constitute the human capital stock of society (Schwabe, 2011). Indeed, PhD holders contribute to the development of highvalue HC that catalyses economic growth by creating and applying scientific knowledge (Hancock et al, 2017) and creating new ventures that strengthen the university-industry linkages (Muscio and Ramaciotti, 2019).…”

Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning

confidence: 99%

Research centres and universities' intellectual capital: a quantitative empirical study of PhD holders' contributions

Scaringella

2022

R & D Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study investigates the mechanisms of intellectual capital (IC) in knowledge‐intensive research centres and universities in the Minalogic cluster of Grenoble, France. We use structural equation modelling to analyse responses from 248 PhD holders. Our results show a positive relationship among human, relational, structural, and intellectual capital outcomes. We first contribute to the early understanding of IC mechanisms in research centres and universities by conducting a quantitative empirical study, which is novel to IC. We support the relation between knowledge‐based human capital and relational alliances capital and highlight the importance of employing PhD. holders. Second, unlike past studies, we offer empirical support that (a) relational alliances capital relates to structural innovation capital and (b) knowledge‐based human capital relates to structural innovation capital. We suggest that research centres and universities should develop an alliance portfolio for innovations. Third, we uncover that structural innovation capital relates to IC outcomes, contributing to the assessment of the economic and social role of public research centres and universities. This study presents managerial implications for policymakers and practitioners engaged in research centres and universities by highlighting the importance of key components of IC.

show abstract

Field, capital, and habitus: The impact of Pierre Bourdieu on bibliometrics

Schirone

2023

Quantitative Science Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study is a critical review aimed at assessing the reception received in bibliometric research by the theories and concepts developed by the sociologist Pierre Bourdieu. The dataset consists of 182 documents, including original articles, editorial material, review articles, conference papers, monographs, and doctoral dissertations. A quantitative analysis was used to establish the authors and countries that most frequently make use of Bourdieu’s theories, as well as the most popular concepts, which were identified as “field”, followed by “symbolic capital” and “social capital.” Then, the article discusses the impact of Bourdieusian key concepts such as “field.” Among the findings, the following are noteworthy: the integration of his field theory into pre-existing bibliometric conceptualizations of research fields, especially when power relations are problematized; the use of the “symbolic capital” in connection with citation analysis and altmetrics; and greater interest for Bourdieu’s theories compared to his methods, although some sources have used Bourdieu’s preferred statistical method, correspondence analysis. Moreover, Bourdieu’s theoretical impact is noticeable in research on journals, university rankings, early career researchers, and gender. The paper’s conclusions point to future research paths based on concepts less used in the bibliometric literature, such as ‘delegation.’ Peer Review https://publons.com/publon/10.1162/qss_a_00232

show abstract

Complexity-based quality indicators for human and social capital in science and research: the case of Serbian Homeland versus Diaspora

Cited by 3 publications

References 80 publications

Development of international standards for university-business collaboration

Development of international standards for university-business collaboration

Research centres and universities' intellectual capital: a quantitative empirical study of PhD holders' contributions

Field, capital, and habitus: The impact of Pierre Bourdieu on bibliometrics

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About