1995
DOI: 10.1142/s0218195995000179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complexity Aspects of Visibility Graphs

Abstract: In this paper, we consider two distinct problems related to complexity aspects of the visibility graphs of simple polygons. Recognizing visibility graphs is a long-standing open problem. It is not even known whether visibility graph recognition is in NP. That visibility graph recognition is in NP would be established if we could demonstrate that any n vertex visibility graph is realized by a polygon which can be drawn on an exponentially-sized grid. This motivates a study of the area requirements for realizing… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is the only upper bound known on the complexity of the problem. Abello and Kumar [4] studied the relationship between visibility graphs and oriented matroids, Lin and Skiena [74] studied the equivalent order types, and Streinu [109,110] and O'Rourke and Streinu [87] studied psuedo-line arrangements. Everett and Corneil [43,45] have solved the reconstruction problem for the visibility graphs of spiral polygons and the corresponding problem for the visibility graph of tower polygons has been solved by Choi, Shin and Chwa [19].…”
Section: Visibility Graph Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is the only upper bound known on the complexity of the problem. Abello and Kumar [4] studied the relationship between visibility graphs and oriented matroids, Lin and Skiena [74] studied the equivalent order types, and Streinu [109,110] and O'Rourke and Streinu [87] studied psuedo-line arrangements. Everett and Corneil [43,45] have solved the reconstruction problem for the visibility graphs of spiral polygons and the corresponding problem for the visibility graph of tower polygons has been solved by Choi, Shin and Chwa [19].…”
Section: Visibility Graph Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A dominating set for a graph G = (V, E) is a subset D of V such that every vertex not in D is joined to at least one member of D by some edge. The minimum dominating set problem in visibility graphs corresponds to the art gallery problem in polygons which has been shown to be NP-hard [72,74]. Following the approximation algorithm for the art gallery problem for polygons given by Ghosh [52,56], a minimum dominating set of visibility graph can be computed with an approximation ratio of O(log n).…”
Section: Minimum Dominating Set In Visibility Graphsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shermer [20] showed that the maximum independent set problem is also NP-hard. An independent set in the visibility graph is also called hidden set which has been studied by Eidenbenz [6,7], Ghosh et al [12] and Lin and Skiena [16]. Further, Lin and Skiena [16] showed that the problems of finding a minimum vertex cover and a maximum dominating set in the visibility graph of a simple polygon are NP-hard.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An independent set in the visibility graph is also called hidden set which has been studied by Eidenbenz [6,7], Ghosh et al [12] and Lin and Skiena [16]. Further, Lin and Skiena [16] showed that the problems of finding a minimum vertex cover and a maximum dominating set in the visibility graph of a simple polygon are NP-hard. Lin and Skiena [16] have shown that the problem of determining whether the visibility graphs of two simple polygons are isomorphic is isomorphic-complete.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is only known to be in PSPACE [8]. For additional work on the question of membership of this problem in N P see [15]. From the characterization standpoint, Ghosh [ll] obtained four necessary conditions for internal visibility graphs of simple polygons but it has been shown that they are not sufficient even for triconnected graphs [6, 81.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%