Complexities, challenges and implications of collaborative work within a regime of performance measurement: the case of management and organisation studies

Abstract

The current demands on higher education institutions (HEIs) to become more efficient and effective have led to increasing performance pressures on researchers, and consequently on the practices and outcomes of researcher collaborations. In this paper, based on a qualitative study of collaborative experiences of management and organisation studies scholars, we explore the complexities and challenges of researcher collaborations under the current regime of academic performance measurement. Our study suggests that researcher collaborations are underpinned by four main rationalities: traditional-hierarchical, strategic-instrumental, scholarlyprofessional and relationship-orientated. We find that strategic-instrumental rationalities are the most prevalent and typically infuse other rationalities. Our research demonstrates that there are potential adverse consequences for the quality and purpose of outputs, the effects on collegial relationships and risks of exploitation and reinvoked hierarchies in collaborative relationships. The study reveals some of the problematic implications for academics and HEIs that emerge as a consequence of research productivity measurement.

Academics’ social positioning towards the restructured management system in Finnish universities

“…It is crucial to scrutinise the human dimension of these managerialist reforms at a microlevel (Evans 2015). The invasion of managerialist practices in universities has many potential human and social costs, such as demotivation, decrease in creativity and loss of collegiality amongst university personnel (Czarniawska 2015, 38;Guzman-Valenzuela and Di Napoli 2015;Jeanes, Loacker and Śliwa 2018). In this article we focus on academics representing educational sciences as they have been shown to hold critical attitudes towards universities' adoption of business practices.…”

Towards an aspirational future: Cultivating ontological empathy within the ethos of Management Learning

“…Indeed, the corrosive and the exploitative power dynamics manifesting broadly in academia – which many CMS scholars have been so quick to analyse, criticise and disavow – are replicated within select spaces of the CMS community (e.g. Bell and King, 2010; Jeanes et al., 2019).…”

An academic challenge to the entrepreneurial university: the spatial power of the ‘Slow Swimming Club’

“…It mirrors Bradley (2016) who argues for attention to be placed on the feasability of the pragmatic university, through a contestation of hope against managerialism. This contestation becomes increasingly relevant considering what Jeanes et al (2018) highlight as the way in which strategic-instrumental rationalities are 'crowding out' critical inquiry, collegiality and research, driven by curiousity rather than from an opportunistic and instrumental rationality. It specifically contributes to findings such as Davis et al 2016, who explore not only the disempowering impacts of managerialism, but the enabling agency of academics to mitigate these perceived negative impacts.…”