1999
DOI: 10.1021/ic990379u
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complexes with S-Donor Ligands. 7. New 1,1-Ethylenedithiolato Complexes of Thallium(I), Gold(I), and Gold(III):  Syntheses, Structure, and Molecular Cubic Hyperpolarizabilities

Abstract: beta-Diketonato complexes [Tl{CH{C(O)R}(2)}] or PPN[Au{CH{C(O)R}(2)}(2)] [where PPN = (Ph(3)P)(2)N] react with an excess of CS(2) to give, respectively, [Tl(2){S(2)C=C{C(O)R}(2)}](n)() [R = Me (1) or Ph (2)] or (PPN)(2)[Au(2){&mgr;-kappa(2)-S(2)C=C{C(O)R}(2)}(2)] [R = Me (3.PPN) or Ph (4.PPN)]. The gold complexes 3.PPN and 4.PPN can also be obtained from PPN[AuCl(2)] and the corresponding thallium 1,1-ethylenedithiolate. PPN[AuCl(4)] reacts with 1 to give PPN[Au{kappa(2)-S(2)C=C{C(O)Me}(2)}(2)] (5) which, in t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
39
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
5
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Au–S bond length of 2.3005(14) Å in 2 is nearly identical with the mean value of 2.3038 Å found in complexes of the type [AuX 2 (dtc)] (X = Cl, Br), in which the Au–S bond distances vary from 2.287(3) Å in [AuCl 2 {μ-S 2 CN(EtOH) 2 }] to 2.319(2) Å in [AuBr 2 {μ-S 2 CN(Me)(CH 2 CO 2 Et)}] . It also compares well with those observed in the [AuCl 2 (μ-SCS)] complexes cited above, in which the Au–S distances range from 2.273 Å in NBu 4 [AuCl 2 {μ-S 2 CC(CN)(CO 2 Et)}] to 2.305(3) Å in [AuCl 2 {μ-S 2 CN(EtOH) 2 }] …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The Au–S bond length of 2.3005(14) Å in 2 is nearly identical with the mean value of 2.3038 Å found in complexes of the type [AuX 2 (dtc)] (X = Cl, Br), in which the Au–S bond distances vary from 2.287(3) Å in [AuCl 2 {μ-S 2 CN(EtOH) 2 }] to 2.319(2) Å in [AuBr 2 {μ-S 2 CN(Me)(CH 2 CO 2 Et)}] . It also compares well with those observed in the [AuCl 2 (μ-SCS)] complexes cited above, in which the Au–S distances range from 2.273 Å in NBu 4 [AuCl 2 {μ-S 2 CC(CN)(CO 2 Et)}] to 2.305(3) Å in [AuCl 2 {μ-S 2 CN(EtOH) 2 }] …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The Au–Cl bond length of 2.3116(15) Å is slightly long for a gold(III) complex, which could favor the displacement of the Cl by the corresponding alkyne in the catalytic process ( vide infra ). This is due to the strong trans influence of the S donor ligands and is of the same order as the Au–Cl bond distances found in the related dithiocarbamate complex [AuCl 2 {μ-S 2 CN(EtOH) 2 }] (2.316(3) and 2.325(3) Å) or in other compounds containing the fragment [AuCl 2 (μ-SCS)] but significantly shorter than in [AuCl 2 {μ-S 2 CC{C(O)Me} 2 }] (2.3491(13)–2.3662(13) Å) …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The S 1 -Au 1 -S 2 , and S 2 -Au 1 -S It also compares well with those observed in the [AuCl 2 (m-SCS)] complexes. [49][50][51][52] 3.4. In vitro cytotoxicity Normal human foetal lung cells (MRC5) and three different human cancer cell lines including breast (MCF7) and ovarian (A2780, A2780R) were used as experimental models for evaluation of in vitro cytotoxicity of the prepared complexes 1-6, see Table 3.…”
Section: Characterization By Nmrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These gold alloys usually contain up to 1% alloying elements, in some cases up to 5% (14,15). The most important alloying elements are the precious metals Ag, Pd, Pt, and also Cu (10, 16 -18).…”
Section: Low Alloyed Gold Bonding Wires With Highest Strengthmentioning
confidence: 99%