2008
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.21487
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complex threshold method for identifying pixels that contain predominantly noise in magnetic resonance images

Abstract: Purpose: To create a robust means to remove noise pixels using complex data. Materials and Methods:A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the appropriate choice of magnitude and phase thresholds as well as connectivity values to determine what pixels represent noise in the image. To fine-tune the results, a spike removal and hole replacement operator is applied to reduce Type I error and remove small islands of noise. Results:The use of phase information improves the magnitude-on… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This algorithm involves first applying a threshold to remove background noise and structures (ie, skull). 23 A shape-filtering noise removal algorithm was then used to remove falsely identified venous structures from the threshold-generated map. Further filtering of false-positives was performed by removal of clusters of connected voxels below a certain size.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This algorithm involves first applying a threshold to remove background noise and structures (ie, skull). 23 A shape-filtering noise removal algorithm was then used to remove falsely identified venous structures from the threshold-generated map. Further filtering of false-positives was performed by removal of clusters of connected voxels below a certain size.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thirdly, phase k-space was interpolated by zero filling the phase images to a larger matrix size for the purpose of reducing the aliasing artifacts in the final SM data. Fourthly, skull stripping and complex thresholding were performed to remove unwanted regions of low signal [18]. Fifthly, a regularization threshold of 0.1 was used for the inverse process.…”
Section: Analysis Of the Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The processing included the following steps: Firstly, a high resolution SWI gradient echo sequence with velocity compensation in 3 directions was acquired with both the magnitude and phase images being obtained. Secondly, phase images were high-pass filtered using a central 96 × 96 homodyne filter [18]. Thirdly, phase k-space was interpolated by zero filling the phase images to a larger matrix size for the purpose of reducing the aliasing artifacts in the final SM data.…”
Section: Analysis Of the Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These techniques include phase unwrapping [14, 15], a regional suppression of phase artifact using local field gradient mapping [17], and the use of a susceptibility model [18]. Signal loss in the peripheral region of the brain was reduced by the use of tissue-air volume segmentation algorithms [17, 19–21]. Despite the effectiveness of these techniques, residual image artifacts often remain in SWI.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%