2022 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) 2022
DOI: 10.1109/icra46639.2022.9811644
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complex Terrain Navigation via Model Error Prediction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several 2.5D maps include additional terrain information. Waibel et al (2022) explores terrain roughness through point clouds, while Polevoy et al (2022) predicts nonrigid terrain traversability by learning trajectory model errors. Gasparino et al (2022) directly learns the traversability of the environment to generate traversable paths, and Dang et al (2020) evaluates the performance of each off‐road path to assess its traversability for vehicles.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several 2.5D maps include additional terrain information. Waibel et al (2022) explores terrain roughness through point clouds, while Polevoy et al (2022) predicts nonrigid terrain traversability by learning trajectory model errors. Gasparino et al (2022) directly learns the traversability of the environment to generate traversable paths, and Dang et al (2020) evaluates the performance of each off‐road path to assess its traversability for vehicles.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10] assumes that ground heights smoothly vary and terrain classes tend to cluster, and uses Markov random fields to infer the supporting ground surface for navigation based on LiDAR points. [11] defines a regression problem which estimates predicted error between the realized odometry readings and the predicted trajectory. And they utilize machine learning techniques to predict model error associated with an RGB image.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study only considers static workplace obstructions; moving obstructions caused by moving objects are not included. This study only considered unexpectedly appearing static obstacles, although model-based predictive controller (MBPC) using neural networks and ultrasonic sensors is also utilized to guide mobile robots around unexpectedly appearing static obstacles in their environment [62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77]. The Dynamic Artificial Neural Network (DANN) approach is used for motion planning for mobile robot paths through [78][79][80].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%