2009
DOI: 10.3923/ajms.2010.33.39
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complex Survey Data Analysis: A Comparison of SAS, SPSS and STATA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To examine if the differences in the distribution of these variables between the survey years were significant we used Chi-square tests. Because the Child Monitor survey utilized a complex sample design, a sample weight was assigned to each person sampled and therefore complex samples statistics were used to produce an unbiased regional estimate [27,31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To examine if the differences in the distribution of these variables between the survey years were significant we used Chi-square tests. Because the Child Monitor survey utilized a complex sample design, a sample weight was assigned to each person sampled and therefore complex samples statistics were used to produce an unbiased regional estimate [27,31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The complex sample survey capabilities of SPSS were used to analyze the data, after specifying that there were 7 strata and that the PSUs in these strata were households. 20 , 21 The sampling weights used to adjust for probability of selection during sampling were computed using the process described by Lameshow and colleagues. 21 All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software version 15.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variance estimates within this complex survey design analysis was correctly accounted for using SAS survey procedures (Oyeyemi et al, 2010). Initially, χ 2 tests were used to examine differences in subject characteristics, stratified by gender.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%