2016
DOI: 10.1520/jte20160067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complex Stress-Strain Relations of Tubular Materials Studied With a Flexible Hydroforming System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonlinear regression models have been widely used to describe the nonlinear behavior of materials. Currently, experimental stress-strain data are commonly reproduced using nonlinear regression models, such as power law, the second-order function model, the fourth-order function model, and so on [25][26][27][28][29][30][31]. But with the development of technology, many new materials have emerged, and many flow stress-strain data under biaxial stress state can be obtained using the new proposed test method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonlinear regression models have been widely used to describe the nonlinear behavior of materials. Currently, experimental stress-strain data are commonly reproduced using nonlinear regression models, such as power law, the second-order function model, the fourth-order function model, and so on [25][26][27][28][29][30][31]. But with the development of technology, many new materials have emerged, and many flow stress-strain data under biaxial stress state can be obtained using the new proposed test method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But with the development of technology, for many materials, the regression results cannot be accepted. 12,13 So several variations of regression models are proposed, such as Ludwik model σ¯=σ0+Kɛ¯n and Swift model σ=c(ɛ0+ɛ)q . However, for many experimental flow stress–strain relations under biaxial stress states, the regression results of these models are not ideal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the SOF model, higher regression accuracy can be obtained by the FOF model. 12,13 However, the expression of the FOF model is an implicit function. Consequently, the flow stress–strain curves under different loading conditions cannot be converted, which results in that different flow stress–strain relations cannot be substituted into the plastic constitutive model to describe the anisotropy yielding and plastic flow characteristics of the material.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…State of the art which can improve control precision for the ratio of axial compressive stress to hoop tension stress and obtain more accurate experimental results. A series of studies [81][82][83][84] on evaluating the yield function and forming limit diagrams under the large ratio of the tensile to compressive stress for several different tubular materials are performed on this machine. However, isotropic material plastic flow behaviors are not considered in these studies.…”
Section: Deformed Tube Locking Gasketmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above equations 2.1 and 2.2 lay the foundation to calculate the circumferential and longitudinal stress components and fit the flow stress curve, which are first derived by Woo et al [50] and then used in many studies [23,56,66,[88][89][90][91][92][93]. Fuchizawa et al [53] improve this stress model by taking into account the wall thickness of metal tubes, and following re-searchers [54,55,58,59,63,71,72,81,87,[94][95][96][97][98][99][100] recommend this new formula because it is more in line with the actual situation. Obviously, no matter in which formula to calculate the stress component proposed by Woo [50] or Fuchizawa [53], the internal pressure, expanding diameter, axial feeding force if necessary, meridional curve radius and pole thickness are required where the first three indicators are easy to record online in the experiment.…”
Section: Analytical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%