2009
DOI: 10.1037/a0015730
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complex span versus updating tasks of working memory: The gap is not that deep.

Abstract: How to best measure working memory capacity is an issue of ongoing debate. Besides established complex span tasks, which combine short-term memory demands with generally unrelated secondary tasks, there exists a set of paradigms characterized by continuous and simultaneous updating of several items in working memory, such as the n-back, memory updating, or alpha span tasks. With a latent variable analysis (N ϭ 96) based on content-heterogeneous operationalizations of both task families, the authors found a lat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

24
182
3
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 199 publications
(212 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
24
182
3
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Shipstead and colleagues (2012) recommended that construct assessment should occur via a battery of multiple tests, which allows for creation of latent variables, thereby reducing the potential for task idiosyncrasies driving results. Multiple tests enable creation of a latent difference score model that uses factor-analysis techniques to assess gains at the latent level (Schmiedek, Hildebrandt, Lövdén, Wilhelm, & Lindenberger, 2009). Our focus was on comparing WM training to memory strategy training in addition to a no-training control group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shipstead and colleagues (2012) recommended that construct assessment should occur via a battery of multiple tests, which allows for creation of latent variables, thereby reducing the potential for task idiosyncrasies driving results. Multiple tests enable creation of a latent difference score model that uses factor-analysis techniques to assess gains at the latent level (Schmiedek, Hildebrandt, Lövdén, Wilhelm, & Lindenberger, 2009). Our focus was on comparing WM training to memory strategy training in addition to a no-training control group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Las tareas duales pueden caracterizarse como de amplitud compleja, ya que requieren la ejecución simultánea de dos tareas: una tarea primaria simple como la anterior y una tarea secundaria simultánea de interferencia, que tiene como objetivo interrumpir cualquier tipo de estrategia que pudiera facilitar el mantenimiento de la información de la tarea primaria. Las tareas simples permiten evaluar el componente de almacenamiento (verbal y visoespacial), mientras que las tareas con interferencia, el componente ejecutivo de la MT (Conway et al, 2005;Hale, Myerson, Emery, Lawrence & DuFault, 2007;Schmiedek, Hildebrandt, Lövdén, Wilhelm & Lindenberger, 2009). …”
Section: Instrumentosunclassified
“…Additionally, the construct validity of updating working memory tasks demonstrated that this type of procedure is a reliable indicator of working memory (Oberauer et al 2000). Furthermore, according to Schmiedek et al (2009), the complex span and updating tasks measure working memory with equal efficiency and use the same working memory mechanisms of building, maintaining and updating bindings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, this task examines several of the characteristics that have been used to describe the working memory system. Moreover, updating tasks, such as the n-back procedure, are moderately (r=0.55) (Shamosh et al 2008) to highly correlated (r=0.96) (Schmiedek et al 2009) with span tasks, and both types of tasks successfully predict reasoning abilities (Schmiedek et al 2009). Nevertheless, see Kane et al (2007) for contradicting results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%