2002
DOI: 10.1017/s0142716402002011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complex sentence production by adolescents with Down syndrome

Abstract: The use of complex syntax was investigated in narrative language samples of older children and adolescents with Down syndrome (n = 24) and a group of typically developing children matched on mean length of utterance. Both groups used conjoined and subordinate sentence forms and did not differ significantly in either the proportion of utterances containing complex sentences or in the variety of complex sentence types used. The analysis of developmental patterns suggested a similar order of acquisition across gr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
72
2
6

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
5
72
2
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Children with Down syndrome also produce fewer grammatical verbs (auxiliary and copula do, be, and have) and lexical verbs (main verbs that do not include do, be, or have) per utterance than do MLU-matched controls [Hesketh and Chapman, 1998]. Despite these morphosyntactic weaknesses, adolescents do not reach a ''syntactic ceiling'' or stop growing in their syntax [Fowler, 1990;Fowler et al, 1994] but continue to advance in utterance length and syntax complexity through at least 20 years of age Thordardottir et al, 2002]. Interestingly, syntax appears to be affected by sampling context, in that adolescents with Down syndrome demonstrate more advanced syntax skills in narratives than in conversation ].…”
Section: Syntaxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Children with Down syndrome also produce fewer grammatical verbs (auxiliary and copula do, be, and have) and lexical verbs (main verbs that do not include do, be, or have) per utterance than do MLU-matched controls [Hesketh and Chapman, 1998]. Despite these morphosyntactic weaknesses, adolescents do not reach a ''syntactic ceiling'' or stop growing in their syntax [Fowler, 1990;Fowler et al, 1994] but continue to advance in utterance length and syntax complexity through at least 20 years of age Thordardottir et al, 2002]. Interestingly, syntax appears to be affected by sampling context, in that adolescents with Down syndrome demonstrate more advanced syntax skills in narratives than in conversation ].…”
Section: Syntaxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the group tested involved individuals in childhood or adolescence, it would be possible that difficulties detected in the comprehension of reflexive pronouns could be overcome with age. While there is no consensus on the cut-off point of language development in DS (see Rondal & Comblain, 2002), there is evidence of improvement in language skills after adolescence (Chapman, Hesketh, & Kistler, 2002;Thordardottir, Chapman, & Wagner, 2002), followed by a decline associated with early-onset dementia in DS around the age of fifty (Chapman & Hesketh, 2000;Das, Divis, Alexander, Parrila, & Naglieri, 1995). The present study examined adults with DS in their mid-twenties to mid-thirties, and detected that the deviant pattern in pronoun comprehension is present at the end-state of acquisition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These represent a variety of morpho-syntactic structures that are essential to early clause formation and typically used to assess grammatical development in children (see Manhardt & Rescorla, 2002;Thordardottir, Chapman, & Wagner, 2002). As a child's language develops, the number of clauses produced during discourse increases (Scott & Stokes, 1995).…”
Section: Dependent Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%