2012
DOI: 10.3176/proc.2012.2.02
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complex search: aggregation, discovery, and synthesis

Abstract: Search engines such as Google, Bing, and Yahoo, supplemented by other information search portals like Wikipedia, have become the means for searching information on the Internet. Along with the increasing popularity of search engines, the academic interest in search has shifted from analysing simple look-up query and response patterns to analysing rather complex information seeking needs. Current search tools seem to support complex search not as well as they do in the case of look-up. Especially support for ag… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gap-filling was chosen for several reasons: it has been used in dictionary research before (e.g., Atkins & Varantola, 1998;Dziemianko, 2010); the subjects were familiar with the test type; it integrates reading and writing, which is typical of online practices (Van Dijk & Van Deursen, 2014); and the researcher was able to choose the target items so that they represented various degrees of objective complexity (Singer & al., 2012), involving several queries, choosing from multiple alternatives and meanings, or searching for a rare word or a common word with an unfamiliar meaning. In contrast, a non-complex target would be easy to find if the entry offered only one translational counterpart or more than one suitable option.…”
Section: B Methods and Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Gap-filling was chosen for several reasons: it has been used in dictionary research before (e.g., Atkins & Varantola, 1998;Dziemianko, 2010); the subjects were familiar with the test type; it integrates reading and writing, which is typical of online practices (Van Dijk & Van Deursen, 2014); and the researcher was able to choose the target items so that they represented various degrees of objective complexity (Singer & al., 2012), involving several queries, choosing from multiple alternatives and meanings, or searching for a rare word or a common word with an unfamiliar meaning. In contrast, a non-complex target would be easy to find if the entry offered only one translational counterpart or more than one suitable option.…”
Section: B Methods and Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, a non-complex target would be easy to find if the entry offered only one translational counterpart or more than one suitable option. A seemingly simple target item may, however, be subjectively complex (Singer & al., 2012), for example, due to the learner's inadequate word recognition skills or low motivation to carry out the task.…”
Section: B Methods and Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Complex tasks on the contrary are characterized by an open task description, accompanied by uncertainty and ambiguity and an open outcome [40]. Carrying out such a complex task typically requires issuing multiple queries, screening various Web sites, and discovering unknown aspects of a problem [10]. When creating the tasks, we made sure that the answer was available on German public websites as of August 2011; of course, the users were also allowed to search in other languages.…”
Section: Tasksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Please collect facts and information (about half a page) about the political situation in Kazakhstan and the living quality 10. complex What is the name of the creature in the following picture and who is the author?…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A search task is complex if it requires at least one of the elements aggregation, discovery and synthesis [15]. It typically requires reviewing many documents and synthesizing them into a desired format.…”
Section: Definitions Objective Vs Subjectivementioning
confidence: 99%