2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2010.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: What's in a Name?

Abstract: Within a two year period in the 1940's, two Boston physicians published dramatically opposing views on the underlying nature of a syndrome now known as complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS). Evans suggested, in several papers in [1946][1947], that sympathetic reflexes maintain pain and dystrophy in affected limbs. Foisie, in 1947, suggested arterial vasospasms were key in the etiology of this pain syndrome. Evans' hypothesis established the nomenclature for this syndrome for 60 years, and his term "reflex symp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…have proposed that CRPS is initiated by a compartment-like syndrome, during which injury-related edema compresses tissue microvessels and causes severe ischemia [7] and that subsequent reperfusion causes microvascular injury and a permanent state of vasospasm, slow flow, and deep tissue ischemia [6,7]. We have extended this notion by proposing that capillary flow disturbances, rather than arteriolar compressions or vasospasms, and tissue hypoxia rather than ischemia, may be central disease entities in CRPS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…have proposed that CRPS is initiated by a compartment-like syndrome, during which injury-related edema compresses tissue microvessels and causes severe ischemia [7] and that subsequent reperfusion causes microvascular injury and a permanent state of vasospasm, slow flow, and deep tissue ischemia [6,7]. We have extended this notion by proposing that capillary flow disturbances, rather than arteriolar compressions or vasospasms, and tissue hypoxia rather than ischemia, may be central disease entities in CRPS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Based on a chronic postischemic pain model [8] and earlier observations of vascular abnormalities in CRPS [6], Coderre et al…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) introduced the diagnostic label 'CRPS' in the 1990s in order to standardise inconsistencies in terminology and diagnostic criteria (Merskey 1994). Two sub-categories of CRPS have been described: CRPS type I (CRPS I) (formerly and variously referred to as reflex sympathetic dystrophy (RSD), algodystrophy, Sudek's atrophy) in which no nerve lesion is present and CRPS type II (CRPS II) (formerly referred to as causalgia, algoneurodystrophy), in which a co-existing nerve lesion (as determined by nerve conduction studies or surgical inspection for example) is present (Coderre 2011;Todorova 2013). …”
Section: Background Description Of the Conditionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, some animal models allow to obtain a disease showing features similar to those observed in patient suffering from CRPS-I, despite the obvious limitations existing in comparing animal behaviors to the characteristic and entity of human pain. On the basis of these results, the most convincing pathogenic hypotheses have shifted to a local process of neuroinflammation, probably associated with the clinical features occurring in the first stage of the disease (edema, eritrosis, increased local temperature and sweating); later, in the following phases, the microcirculation impairment and the microvascular damage appear to be the pathophysiologic mechanism responsible for the clinical evolution that can be observed in most patients ("dystrophic" or "cold" phase), characterized by the reduction of edema, the presence of subcianosis and a decrease of the local temperature (4). The role of the hypothesized pathological coupling between the nociceptive afferents and sympathetic fibers as well as the functional changes at the level of the central nervous system still remain only hypotheses that need more strong demonstrations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%