2018
DOI: 10.1111/itor.12541
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complex portfolio selection via convex mixed‐integer quadratic programming: a survey

Abstract: In this paper, we review convex mixed-integer quadratic programming approaches to deal with single-objective single-period mean-variance portfolio selection problems under real-world financial constraints. In the first part, after describing the original Markowitz's mean-variance model, we analyze its theoretical and empirical limitations, and summarize the possible improvements by considering robust and probabilistic models, and additional constraints. Moreover, we report some recent theoretical convexity res… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 150 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We consider two large-scale Markowitz portfolio [6,7] instances where the objective is a scalarized version of risk minimization (using correlation rather than covariance for better scaling) and return maximization. The system Ax ≤ b encodes the portfolio constraints 0 ≤ x ≤ 1 (with −x ≤ 0 being part of the inequality constraints) and j x j ≤ 1, which imply x 2 ≤ 1.…”
Section: Two Large Portfolio Instancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We consider two large-scale Markowitz portfolio [6,7] instances where the objective is a scalarized version of risk minimization (using correlation rather than covariance for better scaling) and return maximization. The system Ax ≤ b encodes the portfolio constraints 0 ≤ x ≤ 1 (with −x ≤ 0 being part of the inequality constraints) and j x j ≤ 1, which imply x 2 ≤ 1.…”
Section: Two Large Portfolio Instancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method is the latest in a series of exact algorithm proposals for variants of MIQPs with cardinality constraints, often focusing on portfolio optimization applications, that includes, in particular, [52,295,48,60,165,164,18,88,107]. A recent survey of models and exact methods for portfolio selection tasks, including cases with cardinality constraints, is provided by [250]; another fairly broad overview of MIQP with cardinality constraints can be found in [355]. A MIQP algorithm for the special case of feature selection (or sparse regression), 0 -cons( Ax − b 2 , k, R n ), was proposed in [45], including the aforementioned ways to compute tighter big-M bounds; some statistical properties of such sparse regression problems and relations to their regularized versions are discussed in, e.g., [348,298].…”
Section: Cardinality-constrained Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variances of the latter are given as priors gamma distributions. 15 See, for example, Mencarelli and D'Ambrosio [2018] for a survey on mathematical programming approaches for the portfolio selection problem. of the demand model, while the associated shaded regions represent the variance of the prediction.…”
Section: B1 Mean-variance Optimization Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%