2022
DOI: 10.1111/mec.16651
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complex population history affects admixture analyses in nine‐spined sticklebacks

Abstract: Population genomic analyses, such as inferences of selection or local adaptation, typically assume populations descending from a single shared ancestor. However, admixture of populations is common (Moran et al., 2021; Rius & Darling, 2014), and multiple waves of migration and hybridization among divergent lineages can pro-

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
70
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
4
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since selection is less effective in fixing (or removing) introgressed variation in the genomes of smaller populations, differences in effective population sizes can lead to a strong variation in admixture proportions among populations ( Sankararaman et al 2014 ). Population size may thus be particularly relevant for unequal introgression between the recipient and donor population in Pungitius sticklebacks, since these populations are known to be small in general ( Merilä 2013 ; Bae and Suk 2015 ; Kemppainen et al 2021 ; Feng et al 2022 ). In this study, the recipient populations (e.g., P. sinensis and P. kaibarae from the Japanese archipelago) have much smaller population sizes than the donor populations (e.g., P. pungitius from the Japanese archipelago; supplementary fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Since selection is less effective in fixing (or removing) introgressed variation in the genomes of smaller populations, differences in effective population sizes can lead to a strong variation in admixture proportions among populations ( Sankararaman et al 2014 ). Population size may thus be particularly relevant for unequal introgression between the recipient and donor population in Pungitius sticklebacks, since these populations are known to be small in general ( Merilä 2013 ; Bae and Suk 2015 ; Kemppainen et al 2021 ; Feng et al 2022 ). In this study, the recipient populations (e.g., P. sinensis and P. kaibarae from the Japanese archipelago) have much smaller population sizes than the donor populations (e.g., P. pungitius from the Japanese archipelago; supplementary fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DNA extraction, library construction, and sequencing strategy for WGS and RAD-seq are given in detail in Wang et al (2022) and Guo et al (2019) . Published WGS and RAD-seq data for an additional 109 Pungitius individuals and six individuals of three outgroup species from earlier studies ( Guo et al 2019 ; Yamasaki et al 2020 ; Feng et al 2022 ; Wang et al 2022 ) were retrieved from GenBank ( supplementary table S1, Supplementary Material online). Raw sequencing read quality assessment and filtering for each sample was done using FastQC and FastX toolkits, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The dates of three nodes that most studies have focused on (i.e. A = divergence of P. pungitius and G. aculeatus; B = the MRCA for all P. pungitius lineages; C = divergence of eastern and western European lineages of P. pungitius; Guo et al 2019;Feng et al 2022) were shared and supported in both topological scenarios (fig. 4 and supplementary fig.…”
Section: Divergence Time Estimation With Dnm Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nine-spined stickleback (Pungitius pungitius) is a small teleost fish which has recently been subject to many population genomic, demographic and phylogenetic investigations (e.g. Guo et al 2019;Natri et al 2019;Varandhajan et al 2019;Yamasaki et al 2020;Fang et al 2021;Kemppainen et al 2021;Wang Y et al 2022;Feng et al 2022;Kivikoski et al 2023), meaning that there is a community of researchers that would benefit from access to DNM rates in this species. This is because mutation rate estimates are key scaling parameters in many population genetic, demographic and phylogenetic inferences (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%