2014
DOI: 10.1039/c3fd00146f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complex molecule formation around massive young stellar objects

Abstract: Interstellar complex organic molecules were first identified in the hot inner regions of massive young stellar objects (MYSOs), but have more recently been found in many colder sources, indicating that complex molecules can form at a range of temperatures. Individually these observations provide limited constraints, however, on how complex molecules form, and whether the same formation pathways dominate in cold, warm and hot environments. To address these questions, we use spatially resolved observations from … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(56 reference statements)
0
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…CH 3 OH and CH 3 CN, the most spatially extended Oand N-bearing species, respectively, in our sample, possess similar spatial distributions and tight column density correlations across G10.6. This is surprising as prior observations of MYSO have reported a lack of correlation between these species (Bisschop et al 2007;Öberg et al 2014), and both molecules are thought to form via different mechanisms (Garrod & Herbst 2006;Garrod et al 2008). Indeed, in G10.6, we believe the observed correlation likely reflects that both species are tied to total gas column density, rather than intrinsic chemical similarity.…”
Section: Spatial Distribution Of N-versus O-bearing Speciescontrasting
confidence: 69%
“…CH 3 OH and CH 3 CN, the most spatially extended Oand N-bearing species, respectively, in our sample, possess similar spatial distributions and tight column density correlations across G10.6. This is surprising as prior observations of MYSO have reported a lack of correlation between these species (Bisschop et al 2007;Öberg et al 2014), and both molecules are thought to form via different mechanisms (Garrod & Herbst 2006;Garrod et al 2008). Indeed, in G10.6, we believe the observed correlation likely reflects that both species are tied to total gas column density, rather than intrinsic chemical similarity.…”
Section: Spatial Distribution Of N-versus O-bearing Speciescontrasting
confidence: 69%
“…We observed a weak correlation of abundance of CH 3 CCH and bulk gas temperature, which is reminiscent of the small variation of the CH 3 CCH abundance toward massive clumps of various evolutionary stages reported by Giannetti et al (2017) (see also Öberg et al 2014). Other higher angular resolution observations of this species indicated a mixed behavior of its spatial distribution, depending on whether the emission coincides with the localized hot cores or appears offset and/or shows more extended structures (Bøgelund et al 2019, Öberg et al 2014, Fayolle et al 2015. Comparing rotational temperature maps of CH 3 CCH (12-11), the temperatures of G13 and G31 in the core region is 20-30 K higher than those of G19, G08a, and G08b.…”
Section: Molecular Abundance and Abundance Ratiosmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…They have been regarded as good tracers of hot molecular cores owing to the fact that they were mainly detected around significantly heated regions. On the other hand, CH 3 CCH has been detected in spatially more extended, lower temperature regions (e.g., Bergin et al 1994;Öberg et al 2014) and is therefore particularly advantageous for probing sources in relatively early evolutionary stages (Molinari et al 2016), prior to hot core formation. Giannetti et al (2017) showed that among the various thermometers the kinetic temperature constrained by CH 3 CCH is representative of gas temperatures of massive clumps.…”
Section: Distribution Of Emissionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…COMs have also been detected in the lukewarm envelopes of several low-mass and high-mass protostars. The COM excitation temperatures in these sources are well below the expected ice sublimation temperature of ∼100 K. 41,[57][58][59][60] COMs are thus present in protostellar gas prior to the onset of thermal ice sublimation. The protostellar envelopes where these COMs are detected are generally warm enough for diffusion-limited COM formation to be efficient in ices.…”
Section: Complex Organic Molecules During Star Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%