2013
DOI: 10.1111/nzg.12002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complex internal architecture of a debris‐flow deposit revealed using ground‐penetrating radar, Cass, New Zealand

Abstract: International audienc

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in comparison with other studies of GPR in debris-flows, such complex forms have never been detected, and one should be cautious with this interpretation. Indeed, in New Zealand, Starheim et al [9] imaged a debris-flow deposit using Ground Penetrating Radar. The debris-flow was in its simplest form, i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in comparison with other studies of GPR in debris-flows, such complex forms have never been detected, and one should be cautious with this interpretation. Indeed, in New Zealand, Starheim et al [9] imaged a debris-flow deposit using Ground Penetrating Radar. The debris-flow was in its simplest form, i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The loose debris was originally from easily-weathered slate, dolomite, and phyllite with a density corresponding to 2.65 t/m 3 . In addition, it is to be emphasized that the way that coarse and fine particles appeared in the vertical profile within loose debris was also considered on the basis of three vertical depositing patterns (i.e., normal, mixed, and inverse grading) reported in the earlier studies [36][37][38][39][40][41]. However, these findings of the vertical grading patterns were generally restricted to the post-event analysis and alluvial deposits.…”
Section: Factor Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, coarse particles placed at the bottom layer and fine sediment on the top layer (Case E1, see Figure 2a), the coarse particles distributed on the top layer with fine grains at the bottom layer (Case E3, see Figure 2b), and both the coarse and fine particles fully mixed and covering the whole vertical profile (Case E2, see Figure 2c). In order to quantify this, a vertical grading coefficient ψ was proposed and written as In addition, it is to be emphasized that the way that coarse and fine particles appeared in the vertical profile within loose debris was also considered on the basis of three vertical depositing patterns (i.e., normal, mixed, and inverse grading) reported in the earlier studies [36][37][38][39][40][41]. However, these findings of the vertical grading patterns were generally restricted to the post-event analysis and alluvial deposits.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From this accident, researchers started to develop GPR to image the ice thickness, characteristics [17] as well as the ice and snow levels and density [18], before turning to soils and river environments: deposits architecture and related processes [19], floodplain structure [20], and faults through the floodplains [21], landslides' displacements [22], etc. GPR work also extended on the coastlines [23], as well as more challenging environment in term of data acquisition and processing, such as debris-flow deposits [24] and still-warm (600 degrees) pyroclastic flow deposits [25]. Outside of the field of geosciences, high-frequency antenna have been also instrumental when hatched to a truck to monitor highways' pavement [26], bridge structures, and tunnels [27], etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%