2013
DOI: 10.1109/tifs.2013.2285884
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complex Eye Movement Pattern Biometrics: The Effects of Environment and Stimulus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Minimal spanning trees for graphs were constructed, which were used for biometric identification and also applied statistical methods. Moreover, there are somewhat similar features [24] computed from saccadic eye movements to those in our prior research [14][15][16][17][18][19] and also employed in the present research. Twenty-two, 32, and 173 subjects were measured using three different set-ups [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Minimal spanning trees for graphs were constructed, which were used for biometric identification and also applied statistical methods. Moreover, there are somewhat similar features [24] computed from saccadic eye movements to those in our prior research [14][15][16][17][18][19] and also employed in the present research. Twenty-two, 32, and 173 subjects were measured using three different set-ups [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Other researchers in the field of eye movement biometrics have reported results as follows: average false acceptance rate (FAR) from 1.4% to 17.5% and average false rejection rate (FRR) from 12.6% to 28.9% [20] for 9 subjects, and an identification rate of 83% for 12 subjects [21]; FAR 5.4% and FRR 56.6% for 41 subjects [22]; an equal error rate (EER) of nearly 30% for 15 subjects [23]; EER around 35% for 173 subjects [24]; the best EER of 10.8% [28] for 200 subjects; accuracy of 63% for 32 subjects [26], the best accuracy of 43.1% for 22 subjects [26]; and an accuracy of 33.3% for 34 subjects [27]. The results obtained in the present research are at least equally good compared with these preceding studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With the current issues in global security, we have witnessed a rapid growth in biometrics applications based on various modalities, which include palm patterns with high spectral wave [2], patterns of eye movement [3], patterns in the electrocardiogram (ECG) [4], and otoacoustic emissions [5]. Each Takashi Nakamura, Valentin Goverdovsky and Danilo P. Mandic are with Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom, {takashi.nakamura14, goverdovsky, d.mandic}@imperial.ac.uk such biometric modality has its strengths and weaknesses, and typically suits only a chosen type of application and its corresponding scenarios [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An objective evaluation of the eye tracking effects, its specification and stimulus presentation on the biometric viability of complex eye movement patterns was presented in [1]. Acceptable conditions under which to capture eye movement data is calculated based on Six spatial accuracy tiers (0.5°, 1.0°, 1.5°, 2.0°, 2.5°, 3.0°), six temporal resolution tiers (1000, 500, 250, 120, 75, 30 Hz), and five stimulus types (simple, complex, cognitive, textual, random) .…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%