2016 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/rams.2016.7448035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complex data classification in weighted accelerated failure time model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…X ji consists of features which can be used to identify the C classes. In the LDA calculation, each feature vector is first normalized to the range of [0, 1] using unity-based normalization before analysis (for each feature, the maximum value among all classes is set to 1, and the minimum value is set to 0) (Fard and Sadeghzadeh, 2016 ). Then the optimal projection direction is determined by calculating the eigenvectors of E = S S b , where S w , S b are within-class scatter matrix and between-class scatter matrix, respectively (Dudoit et al, 2002 ; Kumar and Ravikanth, 2009 ):…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…X ji consists of features which can be used to identify the C classes. In the LDA calculation, each feature vector is first normalized to the range of [0, 1] using unity-based normalization before analysis (for each feature, the maximum value among all classes is set to 1, and the minimum value is set to 0) (Fard and Sadeghzadeh, 2016 ). Then the optimal projection direction is determined by calculating the eigenvectors of E = S S b , where S w , S b are within-class scatter matrix and between-class scatter matrix, respectively (Dudoit et al, 2002 ; Kumar and Ravikanth, 2009 ):…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%