2020
DOI: 10.1063/5.0014468
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complex coupling coefficient in laterally coupled microcavity laser diode arrays

Abstract: The complex component of the coupling coefficient κ=κr+iκi, used to describe the coupling between adjacent semiconductor microcavity laser diodes, is studied. The complex component κi represents the gain or loss difference between the coherent in-phase and out-of-phase array supermodes obtained from two laterally coupled lasers. Steady-state analysis reveals that the threshold of the preferred coherent supermode is lower than that of an individual laser mode in proportion to κi. We show that the complex compon… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this we needed the value of τ N which is not given in [12]; since in other publications, e.g. [8,17,25], these authors use τ N = 2 ns, that value was assumed here. Our results indicate that only the out-of-phase case shows stability and moreover the range of stable solutions, as bounded these bifurcations, is very limited for this array.…”
Section: A Comparison With Results From the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For this we needed the value of τ N which is not given in [12]; since in other publications, e.g. [8,17,25], these authors use τ N = 2 ns, that value was assumed here. Our results indicate that only the out-of-phase case shows stability and moreover the range of stable solutions, as bounded these bifurcations, is very limited for this array.…”
Section: A Comparison With Results From the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The steady state solutions of ( 5) -( 7) can be found explicitly by using the approximation sinψ s ≅−q which is consistent with ητ p << 1, m s << 1, where the subscript 's' denotes the steady-state value. The results can then be written as In the limit of equal pumping Q A = Q B , q = 0, (9) and (11) reduce to the forms in (25), (26) and (29) of [16], whilst (10) reduces to the forms of ( 27) and (28) of [16] but without the terms of order ητ p which appear in the latter. Since we assume ητ p << 1, this omission should only result in a very small error in the accuracy of (10).…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where α diff is the differential gain, τ N is the carrier lifetime, τ P is the cavity photon lifetime, α m is the mirror loss, V a is the active volume of the laser array [14]. These latter parameters are considered constant while ΔP and P uncoupled are the two experimental variables that dictate |κ i |.…”
Section: A Complex Coupling Coefficientmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the gain of the lowest loss array supermode will be less than that of a single cavity individual mode. As a consequence, when the VCSEL array is tuned into coherent operation, an increase of the coherent array output power is observed and has recently been characterized [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The imaginary part of the coupling coefficient represents the gain difference between the elements, which dictates which of the nearly degenerate supermodes is dominant [5]. We recently reported a technique to experimentally measure both the real and imaginary components of the coupling coefficient using simultaneous measurements of output power, near-field intensity, and far-field profile [14,15]. In this work we will focus on a 2D waveguide model corresponding to 2×1 photonic crystal VCSEL array structures and evaluate the effects of a few key design parameters on the complex coupling coefficient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%