Complex Contagions and the Diffusion of Innovations: Evidence from a Small-N Study

Abstract

The recent literature on "complex contagions" challenges Granovetter's classic hypothesis on the strength of weak ties and argues that, when the actors' choice requires reinforcement from several sources, it is the structure of strong ties that really matters to sustain rapid and wide diffusion. The paper contributes to this debate by reporting on a small-N study that relies on a unique combination of ethnographic data, social network analysis, and computational models. In particular, we investigate two rural populations of Indian and Kenyan potters who have to decide whether adopting new, objectively more efficient and economically more attractive, technical/stylistic options. Qualitative field data show that religious sub-communities within the Indian and Kenyan populations exhibit markedly different diffusion rates and speed over the last thirty years. To account for these differences, we first analyze empirically observed kinship networks and advice networks, and, then, we recreate the actual aggregate diffusion curves through a series of empirically-calibrated agent-based simulations. Combining the two methods, we show that, while single exposure through heterophilious weak ties were sufficient to initiate the diffusion process, large bridges made of strong ties can in fact lead to faster or slower diffusion depending on the type of signals circulating in the network. We conclude that, even in presence of "complex contagions", dense local ties cannot be regarded as a sufficient condition for faster diffusion.

The permanent and unavoidable construction of social practices

“…The previous argument is clearly not a proof of the statement. The discussion has not taken on account the diversity of interests (beyond the generic interest in coordination) or the level of repeated interaction needed for these processes to start or spread, neither we had discussed the effects of superposition of ego networks (the commonality in the reference group needed for the inference of 'this typification is common' and for that inference to be in itself common), the fact that agents will not reach the same inferences, or what factors affect speed or spread of the process, the relationship with social network dynamics (see for instance all the recent literature on complex contagions Centola 2018; Centola and Macy 2007;Manzo et al 2018) and…”

Multiplex Network Ties and the Spatial Diffusion of Radical Innovations: Martin Luther’s Leadership in the Early Reformation

“…Their social exchanges make innovation contagious. Opinion leaders typically have more ties and greater tie diversity than do other individuals, but they may also have the human capital that makes their influence credible (Barabási 2009; Burt 2005; Manzo et al 2018; Siegel 2009). The character of relationships matters as well.…”

“…1 Leaders of movements try to influence people to adopt their innovations, and via their network ties we can capture the scope of their influence. However, to parse out their influence from other factors we need significant relational data about leaders, their social context, and their network—who they knew, what they did, where they went (Brughmans, Collar, and Coward 2016; Erikson 2013; Manzo et al 2018; Watts and Dodds 2007). Leaders create ties to different people and places, which provides a unique source of analytic leverage.…”

New Digs: Networks, Assemblages, and the Dissolution of Binary Categories in Anthropological Archaeology

“…), a new wave of network research seeks to not only describe connections but also model the conditions under which we might expect collective action, knowledge sharing, or diffusion to take place (Amati, Shafie, and Brandes ; Manzo et al. ; Roux and Manzo ; Rubio‐Campillo et al. ).…”