2017
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.117.201970
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complex Coding and Regulatory Polymorphisms in a Restriction Factor Determine the Susceptibility of Drosophila to Viral Infection

Abstract: It is common to find that major-effect genes are an important cause of variation in susceptibility to infection. Here we have characterized natural variation in a gene called pastrel that explains over half of the genetic variance in susceptibility to the Drosophila C virus (DCV) in populations of Drosophila melanogaster. We found extensive allelic heterogeneity, with a sample of seven alleles of pastrel from around the world conferring four phenotypically distinct levels of resistance. By modifying candidate … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
34
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
(122 reference statements)
4
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Resistance to DCV has been mapped to complex polymorphisms at the pastrel ( pst ) locus [ 130 , 133 ]. The primary pst resistance mutation is due to a single amino acid change, although there are multiple structural alleles and cis- regulatory changes that may enhance resistance, resulting in seven alleles with four distinct phenotypes [ 134 ]. Although the function of pst is unknown, overexpression of the susceptible allele provides protection against DCV, and pst is upregulated after intra-abdominal viral injection, indicating that pst is an induced antiviral factor [ 134 ].…”
Section: Genetic Variation In Antiviral Immunity In Dipteransmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Resistance to DCV has been mapped to complex polymorphisms at the pastrel ( pst ) locus [ 130 , 133 ]. The primary pst resistance mutation is due to a single amino acid change, although there are multiple structural alleles and cis- regulatory changes that may enhance resistance, resulting in seven alleles with four distinct phenotypes [ 134 ]. Although the function of pst is unknown, overexpression of the susceptible allele provides protection against DCV, and pst is upregulated after intra-abdominal viral injection, indicating that pst is an induced antiviral factor [ 134 ].…”
Section: Genetic Variation In Antiviral Immunity In Dipteransmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary pst resistance mutation is due to a single amino acid change, although there are multiple structural alleles and cis- regulatory changes that may enhance resistance, resulting in seven alleles with four distinct phenotypes [ 134 ]. Although the function of pst is unknown, overexpression of the susceptible allele provides protection against DCV, and pst is upregulated after intra-abdominal viral injection, indicating that pst is an induced antiviral factor [ 134 ]. In addition to pst, polymorphism in Anaphase promoting complex 7, Ubiquitin conjugating enzyme E2H, and 2 QTLs may also underlie genetic variation in DCV resistance, although these await more extensive characterization [ 130 , 133 ].…”
Section: Genetic Variation In Antiviral Immunity In Dipteransmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, a single gene, pastrel , is the dominant factor that regulates susceptibility to DCV infections [ 95 , 106 ]. In this case, resistance is achieved through higher expression levels of pastrel , independent of which allele was used.…”
Section: Innate Antiviral Immunity Beyond Rnaimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of the S or R allele of the pastrel ( pst ) gene in the genetic background was reported to affect DCV infection ( 25 , 26 ). To further confirm whether Bub1 was necessary for virus infection, precise excision of the inserted piggyBac element by the pBac transposase was performed in bub1 c04512 flies, which restored bub1 expression to the level in wild-type flies (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%