2012
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m112.344911
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complex Cisplatin-Double Strand Break (DSB) Lesions Directly Impair Cellular Non-Homologous End-Joining (NHEJ) Independent of Downstream Damage Response (DDR) Pathways

Abstract: Background:The biochemical mechanism of cisplatin-IR synergy is incompletely understood. Results: NHEJ of non-cisplatin damaged DNA substrates is unaltered by cellular cisplatin treatment while repair of cisplatin-DSB lesions is inhibited independent of cellular cisplatin treatment. Conclusion: Cisplatin-DSB compound lesions directly inhibit NHEJ while cisplatin-activated pathways do not impact NHEJ. Significance: The mechanism of cisplatin-IR synergy involves direct inhibition of NHEJ by compound cisplatin-DS… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
46
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(58 reference statements)
2
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cisplatin-induced and SAHA-induced radiosensitizations involve distinct compromised DNA damage repair pathways It has been previously reported that cisplatin treatment does not affect NHEJ activity, however, complex cisplatin-DSB lesions directly impair cellular NHEJ (11,21). On the other hand, our studies showed that exposure to SAHA reduced expression of Rad51, a key element involved in HDR pathway, and decreased HDR activity in irradiated cancer cells (14,16).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 43%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cisplatin-induced and SAHA-induced radiosensitizations involve distinct compromised DNA damage repair pathways It has been previously reported that cisplatin treatment does not affect NHEJ activity, however, complex cisplatin-DSB lesions directly impair cellular NHEJ (11,21). On the other hand, our studies showed that exposure to SAHA reduced expression of Rad51, a key element involved in HDR pathway, and decreased HDR activity in irradiated cancer cells (14,16).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 43%
“…A chemotherapeutic drug may also act as a radiosensitizer and increase the effect of radiation treatment (10). Of note, studies have shown that cisplatin can increase radiosensitization (11). However, studies also revealed that cisplatin treatment is associated with significant toxic effects and requires fluid hydration, which can be problematic in patients with cardiovascular disease.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, compared to the untreated BUB1 RNAi cells, the number of nuclear foci increased nearly 2-fold following treatment with the DNA cross-linking agent cisplatin, which impairs the cellular NHEJ pathway (51). This elevated 53BP1 focus formation correlated with levels of ␥-H2AX phosphorylation in BUB1-depleted cells (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…9,17,28,29 The presence of a CDDP lesion on DNA inhibits NHEJ 17,30,31 and we hypothesize that CDDP-IR synergy is determined by a CDDP lesion at close proximity to a DSB. However, despite the recognition of a likely role for DNA repair pathways in CDDP radiosensitization, little is known about the actual mechanism and role of the DDR in radiosensitization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%