2013
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0486
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complex biotic interactions drive long-term vegetation dynamics in a subarctic ecosystem

Abstract: Predicting impacts of global warming requires understanding of the extent to which plant biomass and production are controlled by bottom-up and top-down drivers. By annually monitoring community composition in grazed control plots and herbivore-free exclosures at an Arctic location for 15 years, we detected multiple biotic interactions. Regular rodent cycles acted as pulses driving synchronous fluctuations in the biomass of field-layer vegetation; reindeer influenced the biomass of taller shrubs, and the abund… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
63
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
4
63
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although recovery occurred, tree growth in areas of the greatest damage was limited compared with that outside areas of intense damage (compare tree growth in figure 3 with 2004 insect damage in figure 4). The 2012 event had more severe impacts on the understory than the 2004 defoliation, but its effect on the treeline and forest structure is not known yet [41] whereas the 2004 outbreak had no lasting effect on the sub-alpine birch forest or treeline (Rik Van Bogaert 2012, personal communication). Recent large-scale observations show that O. brumata, associated with a relatively moderate coastal climate, and Argyresthia retinella, currently not important in the area, are spreading northeastwards into traditionally colder regions [156,157].…”
Section: (I) Abiotic Environmental Eventsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although recovery occurred, tree growth in areas of the greatest damage was limited compared with that outside areas of intense damage (compare tree growth in figure 3 with 2004 insect damage in figure 4). The 2012 event had more severe impacts on the understory than the 2004 defoliation, but its effect on the treeline and forest structure is not known yet [41] whereas the 2004 outbreak had no lasting effect on the sub-alpine birch forest or treeline (Rik Van Bogaert 2012, personal communication). Recent large-scale observations show that O. brumata, associated with a relatively moderate coastal climate, and Argyresthia retinella, currently not important in the area, are spreading northeastwards into traditionally colder regions [156,157].…”
Section: (I) Abiotic Environmental Eventsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rodent cycles drive corresponding cycles in the biomass of field-layer vegetation. Plant biomass in tundra heath and forest understorey vegetation was between 12 and 24 per cent lower during the year after a vole peak than in the year before, and the combined vole and lemming peaks are visible as a reduced normalized difference vegetation index in satellite images over a 770 km 2 area in the following year ( [13,41]; figure 3). Studies from other regions suggest that rodents should have even stronger effects on the vegetation in high altitude snowbeds [120,165], but no studies have been published in these habitats in Abisko.…”
Section: (I) Abiotic Environmental Eventsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Johnson and Adkisson (1985) revealed the relationship between Fagus grandifolia (Fagaceae) and Cyanocitta cristata (Corvidae) in the upper midwest after wondering how apparently K-selected beech persisted in increasingly fragmented forest remnants. Other plant-animal interactions may also add dimensions to the C-S-R framework (e.g., Chaneton et al, 2010;Grau et al, 2013;Olofsson et al, 2013).…”
Section: Prototype Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spatial feedbacks are at the core of many interactions among individuals, and thus central to self-organized complexity in ecology (cf. Levin, 2005), and are particularly important at boundaries, such as ecotones, where local scale feedbacks can determine the population dynamics and larger scale change (or stability) in biogeography (e.g., Loehle et al 1996;Milne et al, 1996;Li, 2002;D'Odorico et al, 2013;Olofsson et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Olofsson et al [42] provide a compelling example in this issue of a shift in long-term vegetation dynamics from ostensible regulation by rather predictable dynamics towards more complex dynamics once a new component of the ecosystem becomes more important. In this case, field-layer vegetation accumulated over 15 years was eliminated by the combination of a major caterpillar outbreak and an increase in disease severity of a pathogenic fungus infecting the dwarf-shrub Empetrum hermaphroditum.…”
Section: Dynamics Among and Within Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%