2008
DOI: 10.1090/ulect/043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complex Analysis and CR Geometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The boundary term had been computed in [12]; by combining the Morrey-Kohn technique on the boundary with non-trivial weight function. One combines the results of [16] and [27] with the interior formulae discussed above, one can prove that (2.1) holds for the general case with a weight function e −φ and the curvature term. For the case φ = 0, the stated formula was proved in Siu [24].…”
Section: The ∂-Problem With Support Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The boundary term had been computed in [12]; by combining the Morrey-Kohn technique on the boundary with non-trivial weight function. One combines the results of [16] and [27] with the interior formulae discussed above, one can prove that (2.1) holds for the general case with a weight function e −φ and the curvature term. For the case φ = 0, the stated formula was proved in Siu [24].…”
Section: The ∂-Problem With Support Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…This formula is known (cf. [2], [8], [16], [24] and [27]) for some special cases, although it has not been stated in the literature in the form (2.1). The boundary term had been computed in [12]; by combining the Morrey-Kohn technique on the boundary with non-trivial weight function.…”
Section: The ∂-Problem With Support Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Theorem 1.9.9 in [18], q-pseudoconvexity implies that for L 2 0,s+1 -forms f in the kernel of ∂, there exists an L 2 0,s -form u solving the ∂-problem ∂u = f . It has been proved recently, by several authors including Harrington-Raich [8], that N exists on q-forms in a q-pseudoconvex domain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…We refer for instance to [20] for the proof of Proposition 1.1; some ideas of the proof can also be found in [17]. We denote by T 1,0 M and T 0,1 M the holomorphic and antiholomorphic tangent bundles to M respectively; they are both isomorphic to the complex tangent bundle T C M := T M ∩ iT M .…”
Section: Regularity Of The∂-system Tangential To a Hypersurfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the definition differs from [19] and [20] where (1.4) defines (q − 1)-pseudoconvexity ((q − 1)-pseudoconcavity). There is a basic relation between pseudoconvexity/concavity of the two sides D ± of M .…”
Section: Wwwmn-journalcommentioning
confidence: 99%