2003
DOI: 10.1007/s007760300023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Completely displaced supracondylar humerus fractures in children:results of open reduction versus closed reduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
37
0
4

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
37
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, this has been disproved by many studies recently. [2][3][4][5] The rate of conversion to open reduction has been reported previously from as low as 3% to as high as 40% 4,[11][12][13][14][15] and in our series, the overall rate was 34%. In our study, there was a higher trend of open reduction when these fractures were managed early (41%) than when operated on later (25%) although this was not statistically significant (p=0.1).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Conversely, this has been disproved by many studies recently. [2][3][4][5] The rate of conversion to open reduction has been reported previously from as low as 3% to as high as 40% 4,[11][12][13][14][15] and in our series, the overall rate was 34%. In our study, there was a higher trend of open reduction when these fractures were managed early (41%) than when operated on later (25%) although this was not statistically significant (p=0.1).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…There is no definitive treatment for Gartland type III supracondylar fractures. Proponents of closed reduction with percutaneous pinning state that fewer complications such as infection and loss of movement occur with closed reduction [12,13]. Also the hospital stay is reduced.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many methods have been recommended for the treatment of type III fractures including closed reduction and cast immobilisation, traction by various methods and reduction via closed or open means and fixation by Kirschner (K-) wires [1,[11][12][13][14][15]. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of two different treatment options (primarily closed reduction and percutaneous pinning versus primarily open reduction with pinning) for type III extension fractures performed at two different institutes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although irreducible fractures are uncommon (mostly due to interposition of the brachialis muscle, median nerve, and brachial artery [20]), 2-12% require open reduction [27,34]. Surgical exposure can be accomplished by a variety of approaches [21,[35][36][37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%