1993
DOI: 10.1007/bf01076348
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complete set of deuteron analyzing powers in deuteron-proton elastic scattering: Measurement and realistic potential predictions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

5
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As mentioned before, we aim at determining P Z alone, so for this purpose the vector analyzing power iT el 11 is of interest. That observable has been measured at the deuteron beam energies of 95 MeV and 106 MeV [62]. Slow variation of iT el 11 with energy validates the use of a linear interpolation of these data to the energy of 100 MeV.…”
Section: Determination Of the Beam Polarizationsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…As mentioned before, we aim at determining P Z alone, so for this purpose the vector analyzing power iT el 11 is of interest. That observable has been measured at the deuteron beam energies of 95 MeV and 106 MeV [62]. Slow variation of iT el 11 with energy validates the use of a linear interpolation of these data to the energy of 100 MeV.…”
Section: Determination Of the Beam Polarizationsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…1. pd data at 3 MeV from [61], at 65 MeV from [68], and at 135 MeV from [22] (crosses), [23] (circles). Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was checked that in case of applying the full formula describing the N θ pol (ϕ) in the fit procedure, the obtained P zz component was consistent with zero, within the statistical [22], and earlier data sets: RIKEN data (red triangles) [23] and data from Ref. [24] error. Next, using the P z value obtained at one angular point, one can use the above outlined procedure to calculate the elastic scattering analyzing powers iT 11 at other experimentally covered angles.…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%