Complete-mouth implant rehabilitation with modified monolithic zirconia implant-supported fixed dental prostheses and an immediate-loading protocol: A clinical report

Digital vs. conventional full‐arch implant impressions: a comparative study

“…For full‐arch implant rehabilitation, common approach is the digitization of a definitive stone cast, followed by prosthesis milling with CAD/CAM technology (Cheng et al. ; Papaspyridakos & Lal ).…”

Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial to Compare Posterior Implant‐Supported Modified Monolithic Zirconia and Metal‐Ceramic Single Crowns: One‐Year Results

“…The modified monolithic design with veneering porcelain limited to the buccal surface for improvement of the esthetic outcome has been reported to obtain satisfactory esthetic results . A consecutive case series showed that no complications could be observed with monolithic and modified monolithic zirconia restorations on implants for up to 68 months .…”

Digital workflow in full‐arch implant rehabilitation with segmented minimally veneered monolithic zirconia fixed dental prostheses: 2‐year clinical follow‐up

“…However, reduced low light transmission may compromise the esthetic outcome of FDPs manufactured from monolithic zirconia. Zirconia can be veneered with porcelain to achieve more esthetic outcomes after mild cutback in nonfunctional load bearing surfaces to reduce the risk of chipping failures …”

“…Regarding single full arch rehabilitation, two clinical publications reported on the 1‐ and 3‐year outcome with mandibular and maxillary monolithic zirconia prostheses, respectively . Another case series involving 17 edentulous mandibles restored with monolithic zirconia one‐piece IFCDPs opposing complete dentures reported favorable 1‐year outcomes .…”