2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.hal.2021.102005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complete genomes derived by directly sequencing freshwater bloom populations emphasize the significance of the genus level ADA clade within the Nostocales

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…were detected at S13 (upper Makhambet) sampling point (Figure 4 and Table 3). This is in line with other studies, which found that the ADAclade is a highly significant component of cyanobacterial HABs (Dreher et al, 2021), and dominant microcystin producer is not necessarily the predominant cyanobacterial species in the water stream (Dadheech et al, 2014;Lee et al, 2015;Scherer et al, 2017). In summary, our study demonstrates that potentially toxic cyanobacteria including toxigenic strains widely distributed in Ural River waters.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…were detected at S13 (upper Makhambet) sampling point (Figure 4 and Table 3). This is in line with other studies, which found that the ADAclade is a highly significant component of cyanobacterial HABs (Dreher et al, 2021), and dominant microcystin producer is not necessarily the predominant cyanobacterial species in the water stream (Dadheech et al, 2014;Lee et al, 2015;Scherer et al, 2017). In summary, our study demonstrates that potentially toxic cyanobacteria including toxigenic strains widely distributed in Ural River waters.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The synteny of the CYN gene cluster was the same as previously described for Aphanizomenon sp. 10E6 (Dreher et al, 2021; Stücken & Jakobsen, 2010), except for missing cyr K. U. natans strain TAC611 contained sequences for cyr G and cyr J, while U. natans Ak1311 did not contain any CYN genes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both the phylogenomic and phylogenetic analyses used in this study yielded congruent results supporting the unification of Chrysosporum ovalisporum and Umezakia natans . Taxonomic thresholds based on ANI (a measure of nucleotide‐level genomic similarity between genomes) suggest a species boundary at ANI 95–96% (Ahn et al, 2017; Johansen et al, 2021; Willis & Woodhouse, 2020), and genus boundary occurring <94 ANI (Ahn et al, 2017), which in practice appears ~85–90 ANI (Dreher et al, 2021) and corresponds to 94.8% ± 0.25 16S rRNA identity as proposed by Yarza et al (2014). The ANI of the strains previously known as U. natans and C. ovalisporum demonstrated high genome similarity between strains (ANI of >99.5 and AF > 0.9) and genus‐level separation from C. bergii (83 ANI between clusters).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16S rRNA-based phylogenies are so far unable to resolve Aphanizomenon and Anabaena/Dolichospermum 57 . For example, addition of metagenomic data (with morphological validation) from 16 Aphanizomenon, Anabaena, and Dolichospermum strains collected in the Paci c northwest of the United States to collections of Cyanobacterial genomes from previous phylogenetic analyses still placed some strains, such as an Anabaena strain collected from Washington state, within Aphanizomenon clades 58 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%